Bernard Hopkins is Overrated....

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • circleinsidebox
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2006
    • 2396
    • 670
    • 3
    • 12,686

    #151
    [QUOTE=letsgobrady;4593920]
    Originally posted by KostyaTszyu44
    of course hes overrated

    i mean Roy jones Jr- lost a UD
    glen johnson- W tko 11
    tito- won tko 12 welterweight/junior middleweight
    william joppy- won UD 12
    oscar de la hoya- won KO 9 welterweight
    jermain taylor- lost SD 12, lost UD 12
    antonio tarver- won UD 12
    winky wright- won UD 12 junior middleweight
    Joe calzaghe- lost SD 12 bernard ran
    Kelly pavlik- won UD 12 middleweight

    most bernards big wins came from fighting opponents that had to come up in weight to fight him
    great username by the way

    Comment

    • Silencers
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2006
      • 21957
      • 505
      • 235
      • 32,983

      #152
      I used to think he was a bit overrated too but what he has accomplished over the age of 40 is quite remarkable, his resume isn't the greatest but he's a great fighter and a legend in my book.

      Comment

      • circleinsidebox
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jun 2006
        • 2396
        • 670
        • 3
        • 12,686

        #153
        Originally posted by Silencers
        I used to think he was a bit overrated too but what he has accomplished over the age of 40 is quite remarkable, his resume isn't the greatest but he's a great fighter and a legend in my book.
        **** the resume
        look at him deeply as a fighter....
        stop lookin simply at AGE and what he has done in regards to that....
        instead look at what he kouldn't do and what he was unable to do....long term

        Comment

        • Silencers
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2006
          • 21957
          • 505
          • 235
          • 32,983

          #154
          Originally posted by circleinsidebox
          **** the resume
          look at him deeply as a fighter....
          stop lookin simply at AGE and what he has done in regards to that....
          instead look at what he kouldn't do and what he was unable to do....long term

          What was it that he couldn't do? Losing a very close SD that could have gone either way to the number 2 pound for pound fighter in the world at age 43, beating a pound for pound top 10 fighter at the same age, beating the top light heavyweight in the world at 41, these accomplishments are great, no other fighter in the history of the sport has had as much success over the age of 40.

          20 middleweight title defenses against quite a few fighters ranked in the top 10 at the time, he deserves his props.

          And as a fighter, his skills are great as well, one of the most well schooled fighters of this generation and he would probably be competitive in any era with his skillset.

          Comment

          • circleinsidebox
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jun 2006
            • 2396
            • 670
            • 3
            • 12,686

            #155
            Originally posted by Silencers
            What was it that he couldn't do? Losing a very close SD that could have gone either way to the number 2 pound for pound fighter in the world at age 43, beating a pound for pound top 10 fighter at the same age, beating the top light heavyweight in the world at 41, these accomplishments are great, no other fighter in the history of the sport has had as much success over the age of 40.

            20 middleweight title defenses against quite a few fighters ranked in the top 10 at the time, he deserves his props.

            And as a fighter, his skills are great as well, one of the most well schooled fighters of this generation and he would probably be competitive in any era with his skillset.
            i agree
            but not LEGEND

            Comment

            • TheGreatA
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 14143
              • 633
              • 271
              • 21,863

              #156
              Originally posted by circleinsidebox
              i agree
              but not LEGEND
              If Lennox Lewis and Mike Tyson are legends in your view then so is Hopkins.

              I don't have a problem with someone not calling Hopkins a legend because that's term you shouldn't use lightly but Hopkins ranks with Tyson and Lewis no matter how you look at it.
              Last edited by TheGreatA; 01-15-2009, 02:06 AM.

              Comment

              • circleinsidebox
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jun 2006
                • 2396
                • 670
                • 3
                • 12,686

                #157
                Originally posted by TheManchine
                Lets face it if Lennox Lewis and Mike Tyson are legends in your view then so is Hopkins.

                I don't have a problem with someone not calling Hopkins a legend because that's term you shouldn't use lightly but Hopkins ranks with Tyson and Lewis no matter how you look at it.
                hopkins doesn't have the physical skill of a tyson or lewis.....
                im sorry
                great fighter, but legends
                have an "X" factor (no pun intended)
                that bhop lacks.....

                Comment

                • TheGreatA
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 14143
                  • 633
                  • 271
                  • 21,863

                  #158
                  Originally posted by circleinsidebox
                  hopkins doesn't have the physical skill of a tyson or lewis.....
                  im sorry
                  great fighter, but legends
                  have an "X" factor (no pun intended)
                  that bhop lacks.....
                  You don't think his longevity is a factor?

                  He is still going strong at 43+ years of age which is almost unheard of in this sport (aside from Archie Moore and maybe George Foreman).

                  Tyson's talent didn't bring him many great victories.

                  Lewis got by with his combination of size and skill. He wasn't exactly spectacular, just a very solid boxer who beat the best heavyweights of his time.

                  Comment

                  • Zocalo
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Mar 2008
                    • 2169
                    • 51
                    • 144
                    • 8,453

                    #159
                    Um ok... cool. Thanks for telling all of us that.

                    Comment

                    • -Swizzy-
                      The Wolf
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 8820
                      • 431
                      • 330
                      • 661,075

                      #160
                      Originally posted by circleinsidebox
                      bernard is a great fighter but he is no legend....

                      bernard style is made to capatilize on 1 dimensional opponents
                      well clearly you have only been watching hopkins for about 1 year now. his "current style" might be boring but he is 43 years old. He was an entertaining fighter to watch once upon a time. watch him when he was in his prime. don't judge him by how he is now.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP