bernard hopkins cannot beat chad dawson.
Collapse
-
-
plain and simple.bernard hopkins has lost disputed fights against guys that are athletic, with handspeed, footwork, and adequate defense(jones jr, taylor,cal).those are all attributes dawson posses.hopkins is not johnson.he does not try to walk you down wear you out.hopkins game is to pick and choose his shots from round 1 to round 12.he's totally different than johnson.
I'll admit i though pav would ko hopkins, simply cause i believed a couple of notions many believed as well. i thought hopkins didn't have the legs to do what he did anymore,as he showed vs winky, and cal. i thought he lost a step.
i thought he was old, and over the hill. i was wrong.but there is something we must understand, chad dawson is not pavlik either.he's chad dawson.
its not wise to pick against bhop period.Comment
-
Highly unlikely those punches would KO Dawson, I understand you prefer Hopkins but I've seen him withstand harder punches without falling? Hopkins can stop him at times from getting range to throw combos, have his left hook and right, but not enough to win a decision over someone quicker with faster handspeed. Who was last fighter similar to Dawson that Hopkins has defeated. And I can't see Dawson losing by decision if Taylor can get 2 decisions over him.Comment
-
plain and simple.bernard hopkins has lost disputed fights against guys that are athletic, with handspeed, footwork, and adequate defense(jones jr, taylor,cal).those are all attributes dawson posses.hopkins is not johnson.he does not try to walk you down wear you out.hopkins game is to pick and choose his shots from round 1 to round 12.he's totally different than johnson.
I'll admit i though pav would ko hopkins, simply cause i believed a couple of notions many believed as well. i thought hopkins didn't have the legs to do what he did anymore,as he showed vs winky, and cal. i thought he lost a step.
i thought he was old, and over the hill. i was wrong.but there is something we must understand, chad dawson is not pavlik either.he's chad dawson.Comment
-
roy jones was 21-0-0 roy was 24 years old.jones was ranked number 2 by the IBF.
this hole idea that hopkins was green is a fanboys bull**** ass excuse.
if anybody was green it was jones.
either was the best fighter the other would have faced.Last edited by AntonTheMeh; 11-14-2008, 02:01 PM.Comment
-
Comment
-
bernard hopkins was 22-1-0 and was 28 years old and the 1 ranked IBF conterder.
roy jones was 21-0-0 roy was 24 years old.jones was ranked number 2 by the IBF.
this hole idea that hopkins was green is a fanboys bull**** ass excuse.
if anybody was green it was jones.
either was the best fighter the other would have faced.Comment
-
his workrate was good in pavlik fight, not as much in tarver, calzaghe, wright. how would you compare Dawson's workrate, movement to Taylor's? calzaghe been dropped in last 2 fights and ppl still declare he has elite chin, i dont see this being said about any other fighter thats been dropped. i just don't see hopkins winning a decision against someone who throws combos like that.Comment
Comment