PRIME Hopkins would UD Calzaghe

[Testdead]

like i said

how can Hopkins have been at his peak after Jermain Taylor fights when he was losing fights to Jermain Taylor cause he did have the stamina to throw enough punches to win the fight cause of his age

your prime should not restrict you from winning fights cause you get tired and that is why Hopkins prime was around 2001

that is commonsense

Prime should have no age restriction and nothing is normal about Hopkins. Bernard is on his best streak Tarver, Wright, Calzaghe, Pavlik all above 160.

as for the tool that said how can you be peak at 43yo? what about Randy Couture at 45yo or Tyson at 20yo.

Age is a number

[Dynamite Kid]

i Disagree I Think His Best Performance Was Not Letting Pavlik Win One Second Of Any Round.

Remember Tito Went To Get Pimp Slapped By Winky Wright.

bernards Best Wins And Finest Streak Is Post 40yo. Whilst He Isnt At His Physical Peak In Boxing Terms He Is.

And That Is Exactly Why It Was Not A Prime Hopkins Because To Be Prime You Have To Find The Medium Between His Physcial Prime And His Boxing Prime And A 40 Year Old B Hop Was Not It Otherwise He Would Not Have Lost To Taylor Or Fought The Way He Did Against Eastman

[Dynamite Kid]

Prime should have no age restriction and nothing is normal about Hopkins. Bernard is on his best streak Tarver, Wright, Calzaghe, Pavlik all above 160.

as for the tool that said how can you be peak at 43yo? what about Randy Couture at 45yo or Tyson at 20yo.

Age is a number

when Calzaghe fans are making excuses there is only 3,4 years difference in age between Roy and Joe

you guys are a joke Bernard by CLEAR UD

[Testdead]

when Calzaghe fans are making excuses there is only 3,4 years difference in age between Roy and Joe

you guys are a joke Bernard by CLEAR UD

My fav fighter of all time is Bernard you moron.

I look at things objectively and tend not to be so naive both fighters have assets. Its a tough one to call but this Hopkins beats Joe prime FACt is garbage.

Maybe because you have Tito as you avatar you are trying to make hopkins out to be prime when he fought him yet old when he fought Calzaghe when honestly he just beat Pavlik who was undefeated, undisputed, 17yrs younger and heavy favorite.

Your arguments are poor.

[Dynamite Kid]

My fav fighter of all time is Bernard you moron.

I look at things objectively and tend not to be so naive both fighters have assets. Its a tough one to call but this Hopkins beats Joe prime FACt is garbage.

Maybe because you have Tito as you avatar you are trying to make hopkins out to be prime when he fought him yet old when he fought Calzaghe when honestly he just beat Pavlik who was undefeated, undisputed, 17yrs younger and heavy favorite.

Your arguments are poor.

cough Bull****

i never said it was fact so what are you talking about MORON

Bernard Hopkins beats Calzaghe all ends up except for when he is struggling to keep pace at the age of 40+

[Testdead]

cough Bull****

i never said it was fact so what are you talking about MORON

Bernard Hopkins beats Calzaghe all ends up except for when he is struggling to keep pace at the age of 40+

Why dont you check the fav fighter thread.

I have become a Calzaghe fan great fighter. I still find it moronic when people say this fighter beats this fighter prime fact!

ITS DUMB.

[Dynamite Kid]

Why dont you check the fav fighter thread.

I have become a Calzaghe fan great fighter. I still find it moronic when people say this fighter beats this fighter prime fact!

ITS DUMB.

bull**** you are a Calzaghe nuthugger using an ALT account

are you ******ed or cant you read i never said it was FACT and i stated this in my last post hence the reason i asked if you are are you ******ed or cant you read