talyors resume is already 10 times better than joes

[Kris Silver]

Thats why I said Taylor's resume is better. And come on, you don't have to throw insults when some one doesn't agree with sweetheart.

Previously you said resume, but you provided examples making it even clearer your wrong, namely because most of them weren't even wins. Then you said a better fighter, which most people also disagree with. There comes a time you have to accept the obvious, and it seems regardless of solid points you just won't accept something you don't like.

I didn't need to get the personal diss in your right sorry, just had to get a tropic thunder gag in couldn't help it.

[krispy kreme]

Still not about level of competition??? about who has the best wins and as far as i know the wright - Taylor fight was a draw.

Yeah it was, but when we say resume does it really mean wins? Who said it does? It's also about the guys Taylor has faced, and he fought everyone he needed to out there.

[BrooklynBomber]

I have to disagree. Winky would pick off all his shots and counter him.

We'll be seeing Lacy's head snapping back from jabs and left hands all night long.

He would not be able to do any of it, since Lacy just would not give him space, and as many defensive fighters he will likely keep tight on being defensive for the most of the round(after tasting a couple of good shots) and try to steal rounds in the end. But it likely won't work, since he cant punch for **** to keep someone like Lacy off of him.

[bsrizpac]

What skill level?
The guy does a few thing really well, but his punching arsenal is mediocre at best, with his only real punch being his jab. Which is important, obviously, but jab alone is just that, a jab.
He has decent timing, and his main argument in his fights is his shell defense, which is not impenetrable, if he is to ever fight an actually smart fighter.
He ain't fast, and he cant punch, his workrate is average, so what exactly do you see in him?

So Lacy is a smart fighter? Yeah. Okay.

[abadger]

Yeah it was, but when we say resume does it really mean wins? Who said it does? It's also about the guys Taylor has faced, and he fought everyone he needed to out there.

And failed to win.

[Pugilistic™]

Yeah it was, but when we say resume does it really mean wins? Who said it does? It's also about the guys Taylor has faced, and he fought everyone he needed to out there.

Af far as i know your resume is fighters that you have beat and your level of competition is fighters you have faced. I would give taylor the edge on his level of competition but his resume isn't as good as joes.

[rizkybizness]

He would not be able to do any of it, since Lacy just would not give him space, and as many defensive fighters he will likely keep tight on being defensive for the most of the round(after tasting a couple of good shots) and try to steal rounds in the end. But it likely won't work, since he cant punch for **** to keep someone like Lacy off of him.

Calzaghe also cant punch for **** but managed to keep Lacy off of him.

[BrooklynBomber]

So Lacy is a smart fighter? Yeah. Okay.

Lacy is not smart, however, like the guy in your avatar, he knew how to do one thing right, and that one thing would have been crucial

[BrooklynBomber]

Calzaghe also cant punch for **** but managed to keep Lacy off of him.

Calzaghe can do things Wright only saw in videogames.
He is much faster, arguabely punches harder when he choses to, very mobile, very good lateral movement, has a workrate to die for, punches from many angles and unlike Wright is very aggressive. He also can adopt to his opponents, fighting at a righr distance and angle.

[krispy kreme]

Previously you said resume, but you provided examples making it even clearer your wrong, namely because most of them weren't even wins. Then you said a better fighter, which most people also disagree with. There comes a time you have to accept the obvious, and it seems regardless of solid points you just won't accept something you don't like.

I didn't need to get the personal diss in your right sorry, just had to get a tropic thunder gag in couldn't help it.

Let me make it clear, I believe Taylor has the better resume because of the level of opposition he has faced not just the fact that he is no longer undefeated. You guys say resume and the level of opposition is not related which makes no sense. If a guys beats all bums, that means his resume is better? Even if it lacks quality?