talyors resume is already 10 times better than joes

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dirk Diggler UK
    Deleted
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 48836
    • 1,312
    • 693
    • 58,902

    #151
    Why do people even consider Spinks and Ouma as credible let alone impressice victories?

    If Calzaghe went and beat Carlos Quintana and Kermit Cintron, would that be impressive?

    Comment

    • rizkybizness
      enjoy the silence
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2007
      • 26337
      • 672
      • 356
      • 36,512

      #152
      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
      Why do people even consider Spinks and Ouma as credible let alone impressice victories?

      If Calzaghe went and beat Carlos Quintana and Kermit Cintron, would that be impressive?
      You can always be counted on to defend euro fighters to the death.

      Comment

      • Dirk Diggler UK
        Deleted
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 48836
        • 1,312
        • 693
        • 58,902

        #153
        Originally posted by Rizi Riz
        You can always be counted on to defend euro fighters to the death.
        Euro Fighters? Im British not European.

        You can always be counted to contribute absolutely **** all to a thread and make ignorant statements like that.

        Comment

        • Pugilistic™
          MV3
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Nov 2006
          • 9848
          • 324
          • 305
          • 16,773

          #154
          Calzaghe's wins:

          Kessler
          Hopkins
          Eubank
          Reid
          Lacy



          Taylor's wins:

          Hopkins twice
          Spinks
          Ouma


          Looking at this it makes me laugh how people can say Taylor has the better resume.

          Comment

          • krispy kreme
            Fiendin for toilet water
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Feb 2008
            • 10832
            • 358
            • 898
            • 18,913

            #155
            Taylor, he fights everyone & never ducked anyone. Pavlik 2X, Hopkins 2X, & Wright. Calzaghe doesn't have a bad resume, but he wants to fight for money over challenge.

            Comment

            • BattlingNelson
              Mod a Phukka
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Mar 2008
              • 29840
              • 3,246
              • 3,190
              • 286,536

              #156
              Originally posted by abadger
              Those trying to make the case that Taylor has the better resume, or even say it is comparable are fooling themselves. There is a difference between what you want to be the case and actually is.

              There is a degree of comparison between the quality of fighters the two boxers fought in their biggest fights:

              Taylor: Hopkins, Pavlik, Wright, Spinks, Ouma

              Calzaghe: Hopkins, Kessler, Eubank, Reid, Mitchell

              It is debateable as to who has the better list of fighters, I would say Calzaghe, a Taylor fan would say Taylor.

              The problem for the Taylor fan is that their point is moot, Calzaghe won all of his and Taylor lost twice and drew once. Based on these fights alone, Calzaghe's resume is better than Taylor's.

              Then there are some more things to consider: In addition to these fighters Joe Calzaghe also fought Lacy, Charles Brewer, Richie Woodhall, Omar Sheika, Sakio Bika, Kabary Salem. The names I list here are not greats of boxing by any means, but are meaningful wins over meaningful opponents, they all add up on Calzaghe's resume as succesful title defences. Taylor's is sadly lacking in these, beyond Spinks and Ouma who we have already accounted for.

              Then, finally you have to account for the two resumes as a whole. Calzaghe's represents an undefeated run as a pro over 15 years, 21 title defences and 10 years as champion, and a linear title in another weight division, all without a single slip up or off-night, which could have happened at any time. Compare this with Taylor: great title win over B-Hop, proved it in the rematch, two solid defences, a draw, then a pair of losses to the first prime fighter he faced as champion. Calzaghe comes out on top again.

              As many have said already, Jermain Taylor's resume is not even close to being as good as Calzaghe's.
              With that post in mind we are now absolutely certain that Taylor's resumé is at least 10 times greater than Calzaghe's.

              Regards
              flawless, larryx, ragingvic, thadrow, Tengoshi and probably more.

              Comment

              • rizkybizness
                enjoy the silence
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jul 2007
                • 26337
                • 672
                • 356
                • 36,512

                #157
                Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                Euro Fighters? Im British not European.

                You can always be counted to contribute absolutely **** all to a thread and make ignorant statements like that.
                I don't understand why you get so defensive. Makes me sick.

                I contribute much more to these forums because unlike you, I have more to say about more fighters than just the British ones. You seem to come out solely to dispute some soft of an argument pertaining to British fighters. I RARELY see you anywhere else.

                Comment

                • Kris Silver
                  Kneel 4 Silver,good boy!
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 7795
                  • 1,070
                  • 3,576
                  • 27,245

                  #158
                  Originally posted by Joshua Clottey
                  Taylor, he fights everyone & never ducked anyone. Pavlik 2X, Hopkins 2X, & Wright. Calzaghe doesn't have a bad resume, but he wants to fight for money over challenge.
                  LOL. Out of all of those opponents he only beat ONE.

                  Comment

                  • Pugilistic™
                    MV3
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Nov 2006
                    • 9848
                    • 324
                    • 305
                    • 16,773

                    #159
                    Originally posted by Joshua Clottey
                    Taylor, he fights everyone & never ducked anyone. Pavlik 2X, Hopkins 2X, & Wright. Calzaghe doesn't have a bad resume, but he wants to fight for money over challenge.
                    This isn't about level of competition joshua, Its about resumes and who has the better wins on their record.

                    Comment

                    • Dirk Diggler UK
                      Deleted
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 48836
                      • 1,312
                      • 693
                      • 58,902

                      #160
                      Originally posted by Rizi Riz
                      I don't understand why you get so defensive. Makes me sick.

                      I contribute much more to these forums because unlike you, I have more to say about more fighters than just the British ones. You seem to come out solely to dispute some soft of an argument pertaining to British fighters. I RARELY see you anywhere else.
                      Im in a thread stating that I think Joe Calzaghe has a better resume than Jermain Taylor.

                      Well **** me mate, bring in the men in white coats and strap me down. I must be ****in insane

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP