Jermain Taylor: "I Want To Make an Impact at 168"

[Hitman932]

Like I said, I think Pavlik is better but not by that much. He isnt as infinitely more skilled as Lacy as you make out.

There is not a single guy besides Kessler on the whole list of Calzaghe's title defenses who would have a decent shot at beating Kelly Pavlik.

As a matter of fact I think it's safe to say Pavlik would knock out every last one of them besides maybe Eubank and Kessler.

David Starie? lol
Richie Woodhall? lol
Tocker Pudwill? lol
Evans Ashira? lol
Rick Thornberry? who?
Charles Brewer? only 8 losses at that point. lol
Brank Sobot? who?
Juan Carlos Jimenez? again only 8 losses at that point. lol.

Sakio Bika and Peter Manfredo? Has any other undefeated champion made two consecutive title defenses against guys who fight on "The Contender"?

God that it a pathetic resume if I ever saw one.

When Calzaghe fought a decent fighter, Robin Reid, he got a Split decision.

Pavlik would have just decapitated Reid and left it at that.

[bsrizpac]

Its a simple question and has absolutely nothing to do with Calzaghe. Why wont you just answer?

Im saying they're both past their best. I think if Roy was shot, he wouldnt have been as dominating in his last 3 fights. His opponents were not elite but certainly no bums and Roy dominated them and still showed a top class level of ability even though hes clearly not the fighter he was.

Who were those three fights against? Just wondering.

[bsrizpac]

jizzpac is the p4p biggest **** on this forum

Still following me around you ugly racist coward? Go **** yourself racist.

[hunter1]

Still following me around you ugly racist coward? Go **** yourself racist.

you go and follow dirk around little jizz boy. go on run along now

[Dirk Diggler UK]

There is not a single guy besides Kessler on the whole list of Calzaghe's title defenses who would have a decent shot at beating Kelly Pavlik.

As a matter of fact I think it's safe to say Pavlik would knock out every last one of them besides maybe Eubank and Kessler.

David Starie? lol
Richie Woodhall? lol
Tocker Pudwill? lol
Evans Ashira? lol
Rick Thornberry? who?
Charles Brewer? only 8 losses at that point. lol
Brank Sobot? who?
Juan Carlos Jimenez? again only 8 losses at that point. lol.

Sakio Bika and Peter Manfredo? Has any other undefeated champion made two consecutive title defenses against guys who fight on "The Contender"?

God that it a pathetic resume if I ever saw one.

When Calzaghe fought a decent fighter, Robin Reid, he got a Split decision.

Pavlik would have just decapitated Reid and left it at that.

This is about as ignorant a post as you can get.

[Dan...]

There is not a single guy besides Kessler on the whole list of Calzaghe's title defenses who would have a decent shot at beating Kelly Pavlik.

As a matter of fact I think it's safe to say Pavlik would knock out every last one of them besides maybe Eubank and Kessler.

David Starie? lol
Richie Woodhall? lol
Tocker Pudwill? lol
Evans Ashira? lol
Rick Thornberry? who?
Charles Brewer? only 8 losses at that point. lol
Brank Sobot? who?
Juan Carlos Jimenez? again only 8 losses at that point. lol.

Sakio Bika and Peter Manfredo? Has any other undefeated champion made two consecutive title defenses against guys who fight on "The Contender"?

God that it a pathetic resume if I ever saw one.

When Calzaghe fought a decent fighter, Robin Reid, he got a Split decision.

Pavlik would have just decapitated Reid and left it at that.

To be fair you have sorted through and picked out some of his weakest opponents. I agree with what you are generally saying though. WIth the exception of Kessler I would favour Pavlik to beat everyone on Joe's resume.

[bsrizpac]

you go and follow dirk around little jizz boy. go on run along now

LOL at you. Ugly cowardly racist *****.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

To be fair you have sorted through and picked out some of his weakest opponents. I agree with what you are generally saying though. WIth the exception of Kessler I would favour Pavlik to beat everyone on Joe's resume.

Yes anyone can do that. You could look at Pavlik's record and say he went 12 rounds with a guy that had 66 losses. Its quite a lame and ignorant tactic.

Its all hypothetical. Im sure people favoured Khan to beat Prescott, Tyson to beat Douglas, Lewis to beat McCall/Rahman, Morales to beat Raheem.

Thats what makes Calzaghe's longevity so impressive. He's been able to stay on top through 21 defences - some against top fighters, some against **** fighters - but hes always come through even with injuries, off nights etc.

When Pavlik shows even a shred of actually achieving such longevity in the sport then we can talk.

[hunter1]

LOL at you. Ugly cowardly racist *****.

lol at you posting that picture. i bet you get all horny over it dont you? funny thing is, ive not posted a racist post since i joined in may you dumbass. come on jizzboy what will you do now? post the picture again

[Dan...]

Yes anyone can do that. You could look at Pavlik's record and say he went 12 rounds with a guy that had 66 losses. Its quite a lame and ignorant tactic.

Its all hypothetical. Im sure people favoured Khan to beat Prescott, Tyson to beat Douglas, Lewis to beat McCall/Rahman, Morales to beat Raheem.

Thats what makes Calzaghe's longevity so impressive. He's been able to stay on top through 21 defences - some against top fighters, some against **** fighters - but hes always come through even with injuries, off nights etc.

When Pavlik shows even a shred of actually achieving such longevity in the sport then we can talk.

Yeah but the debate isn't between the careers of Pavlik and Calzaghe. I was just weighing up how I think Pavlik would have faired against Joe's resume.