Why do Calzaghe fans deny, lie and distort information.
Collapse
-
He didn't beat Hopkins. It was robbery. Calzaghe fans are ******, how an you be such a gayboys fan? He is a fraud and avoided the best in their primes. Joe would not be so slap happy if he fought Hopkins and even Wright when they had to go around his division instead. Don't even dare compare him to a prime Roy Jones. He would have been decapitated like Woods and knew it so stayed same and sound in the sheep infested mountains of Wales.Comment
-
Comment
-
Hopkins is Calzaghe best win.
When they fought Calzaghe
Mikkel Kessler
Age:28
P4P Status: Wasn’t in the top 10
Wins before the fight: Librado Andrade and Markus Beyer Neither in the p4p list
The fight
Calzghe dominated, Kessler had no answer loses in a UD
Bernard Hopkins
Age: 43
P4P Status: Was in the top 5
Wins before the fight: Ronald Wright Antonio Tarver Both were in the p4p list.
The fight
It was an ugly fight. Hopkins knocked down Calzaghe, but loses his stamina. Calzaghe wins in a SD, but some had Hopkins winning.
- HBO's Harold Lederman scored the bout 116-111 for Calzaghe.
- Associated Press, Yahoo, and ESPN scored the bout 114-113 for Hopkins.
The reason why they say Kessler was Calzaghe best wins
1 They don’t want to say their fighter’s best win was over a 43 year old man which included a knock down.
2 They don’t want an old yank to be his hardest fight
3 Saying Kessler was harder makes Europeans fighters look better, hence helping Calzaghe resume.
4 They are Hoping Kessler becomes a very good fighter years later hence saying that was Calzaghe best win
5 Hopkins made Calzaghe look like an amateur
Hopkins was Calzaghe best win; there is no need to deny this. Hopkins is the better fighter and his status was higher at the time when they fought and gave Calzaghe a harder fight.
this is a very good post.. I agreed with pretty much all of it.Comment
Comment