better wins Pavlik v Taylor ,Miranda or

[Dynamite Kid]

better wins Pavlik v Taylor ,Miranda or Calz v Hopkins ,Kessler

[dstew]

I think beating a 29 year old Taylor (who beat a 40 year old Hopkins) is more impressive than beating a 43 year old Hopkins.

And I'd give the edge to a Kessler win as being more impressive than Miranda win.

[TommyGunn.]

Hopkins and Kessler > Taylor and Miranda.

[Sir_Joe]

You're on a mision aren't you

Calzaghe has far more superior names on his resume compared to Pavlik.

[Dynamite Kid]

I think beating a 29 year old Taylor (who beat a 40 year old Hopkins) is more impressive than beating a 43 year old Hopkins.

And I'd give the edge to a Kessler win as being more impressive than Miranda win.

what is your conclusion overall then ?

[Fox McCloud]

Overall, probably Calzaghe's side of that.

Truthfully, it is still hard to say that Taylor was better than Hopkins, even after two decisions... both decisions were pretty controversial.

Miranda is the downfall of the four opponent fighters for sure.

[Dynamite Kid]

You're on a mision aren't you

Calzaghe has far more superior names on his resume compared to Pavlik.

that aint the question Ricky

[Sir_Joe]

Miranda

I can name 10 people on Calzaghe resume better than Miranda.

1. Chris Eubank
2. Jeff Lacy
3. Charles Brewer
4. Byron Mitchell
5. Robin Reid
6. Richie Woodhall
7. Omar Sheika
8. Sakio Bika
9. Mario Veit
10. David Starie


I repeat.

[WLAD OWNS]

I think beating a 29 year old Taylor (who beat a 40 year old Hopkins) is more impressive than beating a 43 year old Hopkins.

And I'd give the edge to a Kessler win as being more impressive than Miranda win.

Hopkins is still a top p4p fighter at 43, he was coming off wins over top p4p fighters Tarver and Winky....Hopkins is like the Randy Couture of boxing, he's still a top fighter at his age.


Hopkins and Kessler >>> Taylor and Miranda

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Calzaghe by a country mile.

Miranda is ****, lets get it straight. Hes a poor man's Ricardo Mayorga.