Who is a more complete fighter? Pavlik or Pacquiao?
Collapse
-
False, he just uses what works. Pavlik often takes the openings his opponents leave for him. I think he looked a bit more ordinary (in his punch variety) against Taylor, but Taylor was open for the jab/right hand all night.
Just look at the combination he finished Miranda with. He's primarily a jab - right hand - left hook type of fighter, but he effectively mixes in uppercuts and a two fisted body attack as well.
But I do agree with Taylor being open for the jab and the right all night.Comment
-
My reasoning isn't who the better fighter is with my pick. I give the slight egde to Pavlik only because he can fight inside and go toe to toe if he has to standing in front of his opponent. I have never seen Pac fight inside. He either ties you up, or backs up and comes in firing. Neither of them have great hooks though they have improved. Both have good 1-2's and decent jabs though Pav's is better. Pac is the better fighter right now, and Pav is the more complete fighter.Comment
-
-
He gets him with a right hook-right uppercut-straight right-left upper-left hook...something crazy like that.Comment
-
I lied, it's not the combination he finished him with (I had to watch it again myself to be sure), it's the combination he knocks him down with the second time.
He gets him with a right hook-right uppercut-straight right-left upper-left hook...something crazy like that.
I'm done talking to you.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment