Who's higher on your ATG list, Mayweather or Whitaker?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Xplosivo
    Banned
    • Mar 2008
    • 2470
    • 183
    • 21
    • 2,669

    #31
    Originally posted by oldgringo
    Because he beat better competition at every phase of his career.

    He was fighting championship level competition inside of 12 fights.

    Mayweather > Vargas
    Ramirez > Manfredy
    Haugen > Gatti
    Nelson > Corrales
    Pendleton > Augustus
    Paez > Chavez
    Superstar > Castillo
    McGirt > Judah
    Vazquez > Baldomir

    and so on and so forth.
    Funny you put it that way, isn't it?

    Vargas? Manfredy? Gatti? Augustus? Baldomir?

    LMFAO Those are not even Mayweather's top 7 wins

    Corrales, Castillo, De La Hoya, Hernandez, Chavez, Judah, Hatton, AND whats the funniest thing is your putting whitakers best opponents versus mayweather's worse to compare them, man your biased as hell when it comes to pernell whitaker, im done here.

    Comment

    • oldgringo
      Ellis
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jul 2004
      • 12747
      • 968
      • 453
      • 30,064

      #32
      Originally posted by Scott9945
      I can't decide whether this is sad or funny.
      both. it's like looking at a ******ed kid playing basketball. you laugh a little at first until you see he's mentally challenged, then it's just sad.

      Comment

      • Parody
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Apr 2005
        • 13685
        • 538
        • 734
        • 21,205

        #33
        Originally posted by Xplosivo
        Mayweather = 39 wins 0 losses

        Whitaker = 40 wins 4 losses (1 by Stoppage) and 1 draw.

        Mayweather's Top 7 wins:

        Diego Corrales
        Jose Luis Castillo
        Oscar De La Hoya
        Ricky Hatton
        Genaro Hernandez
        Zab Judah
        Jesus Chavez


        Losses:

        0

        Whitaker's Top 7 wins:


        Azumah Nelson
        Buddy McGirt
        Julio Cesar Vasquez
        Jose Luis Ramirez
        Jorge Paez
        Roger Mayweather
        Greg Haugen

        Losses:

        Jose Luis Ramirez
        Felix Trinidad
        Oscar De La Hoya
        Carlos Bojorquez

        Mayweather's titles:

        130 (Linear)
        135 (Linear)
        140 (Hatton was the King)
        147 (Linear)
        154

        6 Time World champion in 5 Different weight classes.

        Whitaker's titles:

        135 (Linear)
        140
        147 (Linear)
        154

        4 time world champion at 4 Different weight classes.
        Pretty much settles everything.

        Comment

        • SmarterChild
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 418
          • 51
          • 39
          • 6,698

          #34
          A lot of people are voting for Pernell simply because their loyd haters, or just plain ******

          Comment

          • Parody
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Apr 2005
            • 13685
            • 538
            • 734
            • 21,205

            #35
            Originally posted by blackirish137
            all I got from that was that you think that Maweather is better because he doesnt have the losses Whitaker did, despite the fact that the 1st fight with Ramirez was a robbery and Whitaker was on ******* for all his other losses.
            Or maybe he was trying to imply Mayweather had more linear titles at more weight classes + Undefeated + Had some names in his resume?

            Comment

            • IMDAZED
              Fair but Firm
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2006
              • 42644
              • 1,134
              • 1,770
              • 67,152

              #36
              I'm starting to feel sad.

              A lot of these youngsters (and I'm only 28!) don't have history of the sport and don't really care. They just latch on to one fighter. Look, it's cool and all to love a fighter but you gotta be objective man.

              It doesn't matter if Floyd Mayweather is undefeated or not. It's about who he beat. And Floyd Mayweather hasn't beaten anyone near the guys Whitaker beat. Seriously.

              Sad...

              Comment

              • Vasyl’s dad
                He said no rematch
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2008
                • 23510
                • 1,120
                • 1,945
                • 50,072

                #37
                Originally posted by Vlad Pintea
                A lot of people are voting for Pernell simply because their loyd haters, or just plain ******

                Or Pernell simply fought better competition, wasn't afraid of any matchup and didn't use excuses not to fight someone.

                In the end, Pernells place in history amongst the greats will never be questioned.

                Floyds already is.

                Comment

                • IMDAZED
                  Fair but Firm
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2006
                  • 42644
                  • 1,134
                  • 1,770
                  • 67,152

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Parody
                  Or maybe he was trying to imply Mayweather had more linear titles at more weight classes + Undefeated + Had some names in his resume?
                  Linear titles? Outside of 130 and 135 (and not EVEN 135!) Floyd hasn't won ANY linear title. But if you wann agree with Explosivo's "pretend" titles then yeah, Floyd has won linear titles.

                  Undefeated?
                  Sure. He also retired at 32. At that same age, Whitaker had one loss - a disgusting robbery to Jose Luis Ramirez that he easily avenged.

                  Had some names on his resume? Nowhere near as good as Whitaker's and plenty of people (myself included) have already proven this.

                  So...maybe he's just a blind fan who can't even be objective just once?

                  Comment

                  • SmarterChild
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 418
                    • 51
                    • 39
                    • 6,698

                    #39
                    Originally posted by IMDAZED
                    I'm starting to feel sad.

                    A lot of these youngsters (and I'm only 28!) don't have history of the sport and don't really care. They just latch on to one fighter. Look, it's cool and all to love a fighter but you gotta be objective man.

                    It doesn't matter if Floyd Mayweather is undefeated or not. It's about who he beat. And Floyd Mayweather hasn't beaten anyone near the guys Whitaker beat. Seriously.

                    Sad...
                    Ever heard the word "achievements"
                    you either really hate Floyd or are sucking the sweet Pea

                    and skill wise, don't even go there

                    Comment

                    • Burner
                      Banned
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Mar 2008
                      • 9090
                      • 346
                      • 51
                      • 9,623

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Pelon Psyclone

                      Or Pernell simply fought better competition, wasn't afraid of any matchup and didn't use excuses not to fight someone.

                      In the end, Pernells place in history amongst the greats will never be questioned.

                      Floyds already is.
                      Do you ever make a post thats not about Mayweather ducking someone...god thats old..the man is retired *** 'em.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP