If Manny Pacquaio wins a 4th belt, will he be ranked higher than Morales or Barrera?

[Domain]

No way. I guess you could say Barrera, but def not morales. He beat a post prime Morales twice and lost to the prime that was left the 1st time

how come you never talk about morales beating a old ass zaragoza?

morales was more fresh then that dude zaragoza but yet he is a passed his prime when pacman beat him?

Anyway my list looks like this.

1.Morales
2.Pacquiao
3.Barrera

[Lazy Liberal]

how come you never talk about morales beating a old ass zaragoza?

morales was more fresh then that dude zaragoza but yet he is a passed his prime when pacman beat him?

Anyway my list looks like this.

1.Morales
2.Pacquiao
3.Barrera

I think Zara and Morales fought in 97, and i belive Zragoza was a 1980 olympian, so that equals and old ass dude..........

[Vasyl’s dad]

Man, apparently I'm on my own in thinking that Pacquiao starting at 108 and winning a 130 Ring title as well as ABC belt is as great as I think it is.

Morales and Barrera were both basically 122 fighters, and neither really fought the stellar type of competition that would transcend making that many jumps in weight successfully.

I'm there with you. The **** is incredibly impressive when you see how many divisions they are apart. Its possible he could have won at every step of the way. I think its unintentionally overlooked though and don't think he'll fare very well at 135.

[Silencers]

lol at him doing way more then barrera and morales and still only be a possibility...

I'd probably rank him ahead of them, just being objective.

[Domain]

no ****!!! what does he have to do, knock out Klitshcko????

I do not understand the hate for the pacman I read other sites and people act like they are not impressed with him...the funny thing is he has the most impressive resume right now and he has been ranked in the top 5 since the barrera demolition for 5 years already! and in recent years he has been ranked number 2 behind floyd jr.

I do not get it people are not satisfied with this guy...its funny he could beat valero, guzman, soto, and nate campbell and hatton and they will say eh he barely did enough to make my top 100 list.

**** that if he did all that he would be ranked number 1 of our time along with ali and robinson if he did all that **** people demand out of this little asian guy.

[Domain]

I'd probably rank him ahead of them, just being objective.

I am just happy that Boxing has a p4p king that actually comes to FIGHT!

floyd jr retiring was good for boxing to be honest

we need a guy who fights the best not a guy always saying step your ppv game up.

[Papa Ace]

With twin wins over Morales and Barrera and about 4 knockdowns dealt by Manny on each of them...

[Domain]

I'm there with you. The **** is incredibly impressive when you see how many divisions they are apart. Its possible he could have won at every step of the way. I think its unintentionally overlooked though and don't think he'll fare very well at 135.

Also keep this in mind...Pacman had no formal training! he basically taught himself to fight till he came to roach...he had some basic coaches but he taught himself how to fight at a young age!

that is impressive especially when guys like floyd jr, morales, and barrera had top caliber Trainers at a super young age...and JMM was basically trained since he was a boy as well by the great nacho beristain!

so its impressive how this guy pacman was able to beat those guys who were classically trained and honed with the textbook and proper fighting style since a young age!

amazing.

[djdiesel]

well said.

[flipside]

if he wins at 140 he can be mentioned in top 10 ATG