How can you possibly say that? It boggles my mind that people are claiming a Calzaghe win over Jones, Jr. would make Joe the "best in the era." This 39 year-old version of Jones is quite simply a shell of the formerly great boxer, and Calzaghe beating him would prove NOTHING.
In his prime, Roy would have handled Joe pretty easily IMO. But now? Come on, man. So what, Jones comes back down from HW in '05, gets knocked out by Tarver and Johnson, then loses horribly to Tarver in their rubber match, but because he's since beaten the likes of Prince Badi Ajamu, Anthony Hanshaw and an even more washed-up Tito, he's suddenly back on top of his game???
Give me an effing break! Calzaghe wouldn't break a sweat in beating Jones. Pavlik-Calzaghe is the ONLY fight that truly matters for Joe's legacy, and that one is, once again IMO, a straight-up coin flip.
In his prime, Roy would have handled Joe pretty easily IMO. But now? Come on, man. So what, Jones comes back down from HW in '05, gets knocked out by Tarver and Johnson, then loses horribly to Tarver in their rubber match, but because he's since beaten the likes of Prince Badi Ajamu, Anthony Hanshaw and an even more washed-up Tito, he's suddenly back on top of his game???
Give me an effing break! Calzaghe wouldn't break a sweat in beating Jones. Pavlik-Calzaghe is the ONLY fight that truly matters for Joe's legacy, and that one is, once again IMO, a straight-up coin flip.
Comment