HATTON vs PACMAN will legitamize Hattons Career!

[revs1227]

* The Ring magazine's World Light Welterweight Champion
* IBO World Light Welterweight Champion
* Former 2x IBF World Light Welterweight Champion
* Former WBA World Light Welterweight Champion
* Former WBA World Welterweight Champion
* Former WBU Light Welterweight Champion
* Former British Light Welterweight Champion
* Former WBO Inter-Continental Light Welterweight Champion
* Former WBA Inter-Continental Light Welterweight Champion
* Former British Central Area Light Welterweight Champion
* The Ring magazine's 2005 'Fighter of the Year'
* ABA National Champion Light Welterweight 1997
* ABA National Junior Champion (Class A) Light Welterweight 1995,1996
* ABA National Junior Champion (Class B) Light Welterweight 1997
* ABA National Junior Champion (Class C) Light Welterweight 1994
its already legitimized i love how people act like he did nothing^^^^^^

[Domain]

* The Ring magazine's World Light Welterweight Champion
* IBO World Light Welterweight Champion
* Former 2x IBF World Light Welterweight Champion
* Former WBA World Light Welterweight Champion
* Former WBA World Welterweight Champion
* Former WBU Light Welterweight Champion
* Former British Light Welterweight Champion
* Former WBO Inter-Continental Light Welterweight Champion
* Former WBA Inter-Continental Light Welterweight Champion
* Former British Central Area Light Welterweight Champion
* The Ring magazine's 2005 'Fighter of the Year'
* ABA National Champion Light Welterweight 1997
* ABA National Junior Champion (Class A) Light Welterweight 1995,1996
* ABA National Junior Champion (Class B) Light Welterweight 1997
* ABA National Junior Champion (Class C) Light Welterweight 1994
its already legitimized i love how people act like he did nothing^^^^^^

we are talking Professional Boxing achievements.

[warp1432]

I like hatton though I like him more the calzaghe but he needs more then 1 win against a hall of famer...he needs this pacquiao fight! thats why he wanted the mayweather fight he wants his legacy to be cemented and he knows he needs a win against a quality foe and pacman is that guy.

Marquez- He was old and he still lost (twice)
Morales- Shot to death. Weight drained. Lost before in tune up. Beat him the first time
Barrera- Got demloshied the first time. Old. Had no place for a rematch
Solis- Is not a legend
The african guy at 122- is not a legend
That thailand guy at 112- is not a legend
Oscar Larios- is not a legend and was shot from his wars with Vasquez
David Diaz- is not a legend and Pacquiao hasn't beaten him

Who's career needs legitmacy now? Hmmm?

[Domain]

Marquez- He was old and he still lost (twice)
Morales- Shot to death. Weight drained. Lost before in tune up. Beat him the first time
Barrera- Got demloshied the first time. Old. Had no place for a rematch
Solis- Is not a legend
The african guy at 122- is not a legend
That thailand guy at 112- is not a legend
Oscar Larios- is not a legend and was shot from his wars with Vasquez
David Diaz- is not a legend and Pacquiao hasn't beaten him

Who's career needs legitmacy now? Hmmm?

weak!

the marquez who fougth pacquiao that night would beat almost anyone in that division! he went back to his bread and butter the matador counter puncher that made him feared early.

jmm was not OLD only in age but not boxing.

Morales was shot? but able to out box david diaz?

jose castillo was trully and I mean Trully shot! he couldnt even make weight for 3 fights prior! morales only missed weight 1 time against raheem.

the thing you failed to mention is pacman did all this in a short period of time so you owned yourself.

You hate pacman dude.

just admit it.

[them_apples]

How the hell can anyone say Marquez was shot in that fight? , he was freaking going crazy with his fists!

Pacquiao has fought some incredible contenders age had nothing to do with it (except maybe Morales in the last fight)

How did Marquez win the first fight if a judges error gave him a draw.

[shadeyfizzle]

i dont know about his career being legitimized i think its already quite impressive...but its a big name ont he resume...but lets face it...hatton should win and i think most people would be shocked if he didnt...im not saying he will...im saying he should and will b favourite.....pacman is awesome tho...cant wait....hope this happens

I hope Hatton is a heavy favorite if this fight happens. I'd actually get triple or more money from vegas for this fight!!

[warp1432]

weak!

the marquez who fougth pacquiao that night would beat almost anyone in that division! he went back to his bread and butter the matador counter puncher that made him feared early.

jmm was not OLD only in age but not boxing.

Morales was shot? but able to out box david diaz?

Or Diaz is just ****. That's the one.

the marquez who fougth pacquiao that night would beat almost anyone in that division! he went back to his bread and butter the matador counter puncher that made him feared early.

Is that why he almost lost to ancient Barrera? Is that why he lost to Chris John? Because he was in his prime?

the thing you failed to mention is pacman did all this in a short period of time so you owned yourself.

Yeah can't blame him. He was playing duck duck goose advoiding real challenges like Marquez until he got old, Guzman, Soto, and Valero and taking on the senior citzen club down in mexico.

jose castillo was trully and I mean Trully shot! he couldnt even make weight for 3 fights prior! morales only missed weight 1 time against raheem.

JLC couldn't make at 135. He was fully refreshed at 140. It was obvious by his great showcase against Herman Ngoudjo.

Yes Morales missed weight against Raheem...at 135. How the **** was he supposed to make 130 for the rematch???? He also was obviously weight drained in the second match because his legs were totally gone at 130 compared to the first match.
I don't pretty much believe any of this. I'm just showing how easy it is to ridducle someone's whole career by making it seem like nothing. Just like Domain did for Hatton

You just hate Pacquiao

Yep, maybe if he wasn't so ****ty and had a **** ass resume then he'd earn my respect. But he doesn't. Pacquiao is a joke and a fruad. Plain and Basic common sense

[shadeyfizzle]

Marquez- He was old and he still lost (twice)
Morales- Shot to death. Weight drained. Lost before in tune up. Beat him the first time
Barrera- Got demloshied the first time. Old. Had no place for a rematch
Solis- Is not a legend
The african guy at 122- is not a legend
That thailand guy at 112- is not a legend
Oscar Larios- is not a legend and was shot from his wars with Vasquez
David Diaz- is not a legend and Pacquiao hasn't beaten him

Who's career needs legitmacy now? Hmmm?

Morales- came within 1pt of winning a belt at 135 after the Pac trilogy.
Barerra- got demolished the 1st time then went undefeated for the next 4 years.
The african guy- undefeated prospect. Fight with Pac was title eliminator 4 Barrera
The thailand guy- was undefeated at the time
Solis-was undefeated at the time
Larios- still a solid fighter today

[warp1432]

Read above.

[Left Hook Tua]

Morales- came within 1pt of winning a belt at 135 after the Pac trilogy.
Barerra- got demolished the 1st time then went undefeated for the next 4 years.
The african guy- undefeated prospect. Fight with Pac was title eliminator 4 Barrera
The thailand guy- was undefeated at the time
Solis-was undefeated at the time
Larios- still a solid fighter today

the african guy? the thailand guy?

we need to give fighters with non-english , non-spanish names a nickname.

the african guy he was talking about was ledwaba. he wasn't an undefeated prospect. he was the 122 ibf champion. manny was just a late substitute because hbo was showcasing lehlo as the possible next great. they ended up showcasing manny instead and the rest they say is history.

the thailand guy was the wbc flyweight champ changsakul (spelling?) he was the #1 in that division i think at the time. i could be wrong though......but he was either 1 or 2 in the division at the time manny beat him.