You *****'s Are RIDICULOUS...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • C'MONMANG'
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Oct 2007
    • 7002
    • 172
    • 21
    • 7,389

    #61
    Originally posted by bsrizpac
    Because Muassa is not any good. period. So you trumping it kinda odd.

    Hatton got the fight because TONS of people (very similar to the people yelling Cotto and Marg now) were saying Floyd was ducking him. Floyd was scared. Floyd would never fight him. In fact this place was the home for such sentiments. Hatton ran his mouth over and over again nonstop.

    Now as you remember Floyd had just fought Oscar at 150ish. He knew about Hatton's weakness and he knew from the Roy Jones/Tarver weight class, that dropping back down would not be good for him. Remember the Ricky Hatton is bigger than Floyd threads? Too powerful? Remember that Hatton started off where he was, and Floyd moved up from way south of that weight. It's Hatton's fault for agreeing to that weight. It doesn't discount the win. Do you really think Hatton would have beaten Floyd at 140? Even if not, and your whole point is about the WW division, do you really think Floyd was ducking Margarito when the Oscar fight was there for him? Why would someone fight Marg instead of Oscar? Especially when that someone has been trying to get a fight with Oscar for years and has been calling him out for years. I'm just saying.....

    All of these points are simply things that can make your statement "Hatton ****** at 147" seem an oversimplfication. Which it is. You don't account for anything Marg does or Cotto does.. You defend how much bigger Santos was when he beat Marg, but don't give Floyd credit for going up and beating a bigger Oscar.

    My point is: YOU CAN DISCOUNT any win. Except for guys like Moradde Hakkar. Everyone can agree that he's a bum.

    I agree that Floyd should fight the winner of Cotto/Marg. However, if he wishes to stay retired, that doesn't mean he wasn't great.


    OK loser, didnt read past that line.. NOBODY said that, especially at 147, BUT WHATEVER.. lmao...

    Comment

    • BmoreBrawler
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2006
      • 4594
      • 130
      • 315
      • 11,672

      #62
      Originally posted by The Evil Genius

      You act like I'm the ONLY person on earth who is a boxing first fan that has an issue with Mayweathers extreme pussification.
      The entire HBO crew and most of the boxing writers feel the same way.

      Comment

      • The Gambler1981
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2008
        • 25961
        • 521
        • 774
        • 49,039

        #63
        Your Quote
        "LMAO. why cant I? Cotto fought him at 140 gave him his first L.

        Hatton had no business at 147, showed it in the Collzao fight , went back down to 140. Then goes back to 147 to fight Floyd and is BACK at 140 again.

        HATTON ISNT A TOP WW, HE DID NOTHING TO DESERVE THAT FIGHT. Since beating Baldo for his WW title FLOYD HAS FOUGHT ZERO TOP WELTER AND EVEN STATED THAT HE HAD NO INTEREST IN FIGHT MIGUEL COTTO...

        Cotto's victory isnt anymore impressive then Floyds over Judah...HAPPY??

        Quitana, Mosley and now MARGARITO!! please go away!!"

        My quote
        "So you say he is gonna beat Margritto too? If Cotto loses to Marg that means he lost to the first champion he has faced in the ring and make his resume look like ****."



        It looks like your adding Marg to Cotto accomplishment list to me. You also never answered me asto what shampions Cotto has taken thier belts in the ring. Marg has done that, so I respect him. I do however not respect anybelt that was not taken off a champion in the ring. Do you have Downs Syndrome? I seriously will stop talking **** to you if you do and appologize.

        Comment

        • C'MONMANG'
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Oct 2007
          • 7002
          • 172
          • 21
          • 7,389

          #64
          Originally posted by bsrizpac
          Because Muassa is not any good. period. So you trumping it kinda odd.

          Hatton got the fight because TONS of people (very similar to the people yelling Cotto and Marg now) were saying Floyd was ducking him. Floyd was scared. Floyd would never fight him. In fact this place was the home for such sentiments. Hatton ran his mouth over and over again nonstop.

          Now as you remember Floyd had just fought Oscar at 150ish. He knew about Hatton's weakness and he knew from the Roy Jones/Tarver weight class, that dropping back down would not be good for him. Remember the Ricky Hatton is bigger than Floyd threads? Too powerful? Remember that Hatton started off where he was, and Floyd moved up from way south of that weight. It's Hatton's fault for agreeing to that weight. It doesn't discount the win. Do you really think Hatton would have beaten Floyd at 140? Even if not, and your whole point is about the WW division, do you really think Floyd was ducking Margarito when the Oscar fight was there for him? Why would someone fight Marg instead of Oscar? Especially when that someone has been trying to get a fight with Oscar for years and has been calling him out for years. I'm just saying.....

          All of these points are simply things that can make your statement "Hatton ****** at 147" seem an oversimplfication. Which it is. You don't account for anything Marg does or Cotto does.. You defend how much bigger Santos was when he beat Marg, but don't give Floyd credit for going up and beating a bigger Oscar.
          My point is: YOU CAN DISCOUNT any win. Except for guys like Moradde Hakkar. Everyone can agree that he's a bum.

          I agree that Floyd should fight the winner of Cotto/Marg. However, if he wishes to stay retired, that doesn't mean he wasn't great.

          go read what I said about that in the other thread, (Cant remember which one ) I SAID size wasnt an EXCUSE..
          BTW the fight was stopped premature cuz of a head butt and was in PR.. please, you suck at this.....

          Comment

          • flodistheshizle
            Banned
            • Feb 2008
            • 607
            • 24
            • 0
            • 768

            #65
            Originally posted by c'monmang'
            when he fought Miguel Cotto.

            Mosley had just given Collazo a one sided beat down. So that theory is GARBAGE ..not surprised tho coming from FLODISTHESHIZLE..lmao


            Are you honestly telling me that was the same Mosley that Cotto "beat".

            Fighters do get old overnight.Mosley was 35 at the time he fought Collazo and
            36 when he fought Cotto.

            Comment

            • bsrizpac
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2004
              • 6837
              • 289
              • 21
              • 7,134

              #66
              Originally posted by c'monmang'
              OK loser, didnt read past that line.. NOBODY said that, especially at 147, BUT WHATEVER.. lmao...
              Ummm pretty much all of the UK. You must have some sort of short memory syndrome that causes you to forget all of last year and the year before that. Pretty much since Gatti fought Floyd.

              But resorting to insults : you win the debate. Good job.

              Comment

              • C'MONMANG'
                Banned
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Oct 2007
                • 7002
                • 172
                • 21
                • 7,389

                #67
                Originally posted by flodistheshizle
                Are you honestly telling me that was the same Mosley that Cotto "beat".

                Fighters do get old overnight.Mosley was 35 at the time he fought Collazo and
                36 when he fought Cotto
                .
                LMAO.. oh well that explains it!!!

                Comment

                • bsrizpac
                  Banned
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • May 2004
                  • 6837
                  • 289
                  • 21
                  • 7,134

                  #68
                  Originally posted by c'monmang'
                  go read what I said about that in the other thread, (Cant remember which one ) I SAID size wasnt an EXCUSE..
                  BTW the fight was stopped premature cuz of a head butt and was in PR.. please, you suck at this.....
                  Yes thanks for updating how that fight went. Good thing I already knew that. Anything else? Any more insults rather than speaking intelligently or attempting to be civil?

                  Comment

                  • KING •
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Mar 2008
                    • 3370
                    • 156
                    • 102
                    • 4,016

                    #69
                    Exactly...

                    Just because I'm vocal about it and like the fighter who is going to end his idols reign...

                    I'm "owned" and an "E-Thug" and all this nonsense...

                    LMFAO...

                    Money May a veteran of watching Floyd Mayweather for two years...

                    Comment

                    • C'MONMANG'
                      Banned
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Oct 2007
                      • 7002
                      • 172
                      • 21
                      • 7,389

                      #70
                      Originally posted by bsrizpac
                      Because Muassa is not any good. period. So you trumping it kinda odd.

                      Hatton got the fight because TONS of people (very similar to the people yelling Cotto and Marg now) were saying Floyd was ducking him. Floyd was scared. Floyd would never fight him. In fact this place was the home for such sentiments. Hatton ran his mouth over and over again nonstop.

                      Now as you remember Floyd had just fought Oscar at 150ish. He knew about Hatton's weakness and he knew from the Roy Jones/Tarver weight class, that dropping back down would not be good for him. Remember the Ricky Hatton is bigger than Floyd threads? Too powerful? Remember that Hatton started off where he was, and Floyd moved up from way south of that weight. It's Hatton's fault for agreeing to that weight. It doesn't discount the win. Do you really think Hatton would have beaten Floyd at 140? Even if not, and your whole point is about the WW division, do you really think Floyd was ducking Margarito when the Oscar fight was there for him? Why would someone fight Marg instead of Oscar? Especially when that someone has been trying to get a fight with Oscar for years and has been calling him out for years. I'm just saying.....

                      All of these points are simply things that can make your statement "Hatton ****** at 147" seem an oversimplfication. Which it is. You don't account for anything Marg does or Cotto does.. You defend how much bigger Santos was when he beat Marg, but don't give Floyd credit for going up and beating a bigger Oscar.

                      My point is: YOU CAN DISCOUNT any win. Except for guys like Moradde Hakkar. Everyone can agree that he's a bum.

                      I agree that Floyd should fight the winner of Cotto/Marg. However, if he wishes to stay retired, that doesn't mean he wasn't great.
                      STICK WITH THE TOPIC...

                      I feel Floyd would beat HAtton at 140 as well. but we arent arguing that, why are you so slow?

                      HATTON ISNT A TOP WELTER....Floyd refuses to figh one..

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP