You *****'s Are RIDICULOUS...

[C'MONMANG']

"Mosley wasnt shot! are kidding me???
his resume at 147 and 140 TRUMPS Floyds.."

Mosley never even beat a fighter the calibur of Arturro Gatti at 140. Now he would have done ok in the division imo there is no proof.

I do not know what was up with Quintanna when he fought Cotto, in that fight he really did not look like the guy who beat Williams or the guy that beat Julio. A victory is a victory though and he beat the **** out of him.

Who had Torress,Pinto , Malinainaggi and Maussa beat to be that great or what have they really done since. I mean Torress belt is kinda tainted but maybe he really beat Holt I do not know. Paulie is what Paulie is and he will never be that great a feather fisted speed guy that eats to many clean punches. The other 2 are nobodies now and then.

who cares how Mosley would have done at 140? what sense does that make?

[COACH WEBB]

It DOES matter who is fighting who...

When you have douche bags who support a moron who is only fighting for money...

The self proclaimed G.O.A.T hasn't faced a number one contender in how long...

I rest my case...

well if it DOES matter then DONT make statements like, "I am a FAN OF BOXING FIRST.." ....when you make a statement like that, then say what fights that you DON'T watch, it raises a RED flag. Because you CONTRADICT your own very statement that you are "a FAN OF BOXING FIRST". The question then arises in my head, I know that you are a fan of boxing BUT are you really a "FAN OF BOXING FIRST"?...

A fan of boxing FIRST says, " I really dont like these two fighters, but since I have a fan of BOXING FIRST (not the fighters that may be fighting), I will watch it"

The type of fan you have been shown to be is, "I am a fan of boxing FIRST, but I aint going to watch no these fighters because of their greed, and blah, blah, blah".

do you see the point I am trying to make??

[The Gambler1981]

Because he never fought there. Oh your talking about Cotto at 140. What championship belts has Cotto taken in the squared circle. Who were these mythical champions. Also please agrue the whole post please i argued all of yours you should offer the same courtesy.

[C'MONMANG']

Because he never fought there. Oh your talking about Cotto at 140. What championship belts has Cotto taken in the squared circle. Who were these mythical champions. Also please agrue the whole post please i argued all of yours you should offer the same courtesy.

what are you rambling about?

[The Gambler1981]

It is pretty clear im sorry if you can not understand. Im sorry for calling out someone so slow. I will find someone better to talk to.

[C'MONMANG']

It is pretty clear im sorry if you can not understand. Im sorry for calling out someone so slow. I will find someone better to talk to.

if you have a question, ask it.

As far as someone asking what Mosley did at 140, that makes no sense. Cotto fought SSM at 147. SSM used to be RING champ at 147 an dhe just came off a win against Collzao at 147.

[Sweet Pea 50]

It is pretty clear im sorry if you can not understand. Im sorry for calling out someone so slow. I will find someone better to talk to.

I like this guy...

[C'MONMANG']

I like this guy...

he isnt making sense, course you like him

[bsrizpac]

Cotto stops Judah low blows or not. Was a point taken away? ( i cant remember)..

Mosley wasnt shot! are kidding me???
his resume at 147 and 140 TRUMPS Floyds..

dude Torres was 28-0..

QUITNANA AT 147 DEBUT, UNDEFEATED........

MAlighnaggi was undefeated

Maussa was undefeated

Pinto was undefeated...

Wow. Where to begin. Mosely is shot. He's not the Mosely of old. He's still really good. That's the whole point, I COULD make those arguments, but I'm not going to.

You hate Floyd. Even if Floyd fights cotto tommorow and TKOs him you won't be happy. Let's get that out of the way.

The Judah low blows were ridiculous. Please don't deny that they weren't extreme. As for the point deductions, fine, but rewatch the fight and tell me they weren't brutal.

Now was to your logic of all these "undefeated" guys Cotto had trouble with. Remember how you defend Marg? How Marg lost to unkowns in Tijuana etc. etc. Well just in the same way I can say that most of the guys might have had padded records down from whatever country they came from.

Also remember, you don't respect Floyd's undefeated record, so it's hardly proper to tout undefeated guys as some mark of them being good.

dude Torres was 28-0..

QUITNANA AT 147 DEBUT, UNDEFEATED........

He is a good fighter. It's a good win, what's your point?

MAlighnaggi was undefeated

Do you think Pualie was a great threat? Do you think he'd be a threat to Floyd? be honest here.

Maussa was undefeated

Are you really trumpeting Maussa as an achievement? Didn't Ricky Hatton cleave his head off? The same Hatton you dismiss as "too small" for Floyd?

Pinto was undefeated.

Again undefeated does not always mean good. Pinto was game, and decent. That's it.

My point isn't even that your counterpoints here are wrong. I'm just saying it's unfair to use this logic to defend Cotto or Marg, then ignore this logic when attacking Floyd. That's all.

[Sweet Pea 50]

he isnt making sense, course you like him

Get that sand out of your mangina. That **** could cause a yeast infection....