Margarito too slow? flat footed? too wide? What a joke....

[ANDROID_DOES]

So was Julio Cesar Chavez probably the greates mexican fighter of all time SO WHAT!!! Skill only takes you so far (not to mention cotto is not this masterful boxer) that most of you dumb ass' think he is. Styles make fights and it's funny how you guys down play margarito's "so called" "weakness'" When in reality his weakness' don't affect his fighting style. Antonio Margarito is almost the same exact fighter Julio Cesar Chavez was! JCC did just fine if you ask me All Margarito hater can say is "he lost 5 times" well sugar ray robinson lost 19 times, ali lost 5 times, roy jones jr. has 4 losses, evander hollyfield has 9 losses. Im not comparing tony's skill to these guys but what i am saying is losing a fight doesnt mean ****. Especially when you turned pro at almost 16 and was fighting against men. 3 of his losses were before he was 18. The combine record of his opposition in those 3 losses were 31-3!!!

Now the famous daniel santos fight that morons bring up without knowing much of anything trying to use that against margarito. Daniel santos is a ****en light middleweight!!! Margarito lost the fight by technicality. Fight stopped due to a cut that was caused by A HEAD BUTT!!! Margarito was winning on one of the judges card and down by one point on another one...is that really getting his ass kicked like some suggest??? Never mind that margarito is a strong finisher and could have easily won the last 4 rounds.

The pw loss was a blessing in disguise. PLus we all know who did the real damage and we all know who wins a rematch!

Cotto will have his hands full. Cotto fans underestimate margarito's will and power too much. You will have a rude awaking july 26th! This is a toss up fight with each fighter having an equal chance to beat the other. All this cotto ko'ing margarito talk is bull**** because we all know the only person being realistically knocked out is cotto not margarito! I hope he tax that chin!!! If gomez can make cotto's knee's buckle margarito could make them break!!! WAAAAR!!!!!!!!!

[My Name Is...]

Damn good thread homie. Here is some Green K.

[Addison]

Santos was a murderer against Margarito. A killer for some reason.

I put nothing on that. Every fighter has a nemesis.

Margarito is Cotto's Santos.

[ANDROID_DOES]

Santos was a murderer against Margarito. A killer for some reason.

I put nothing on that. Every fighter has a nemesis.

Margarito is Cotto's Santos.

Fight was stopped cause a head butt. Margarito was winning on one card and down by one point on the other. Santos did not murder margarito as some say (******s) margarito had the momentum and is a strong finisher stronger than santos and could have easily won the last rounds to win the fight

[Addison]

Fight was stopped cause a head butt. Margarito was winning on one card and down by one point on the other. Santos did not murder margarito as some say (******s) margarito had the momentum and is a strong finisher stronger than santos and could have easily won the last rounds to win the fight

Thanks, but I'm well aware of the details. How the words strike you is one thing but Santos fighting sharper and more deadly against Margarito than virtually anyone else he's ever faced adds up to some colorful language.

Fighting like a murderer and murdering or having murdered someone are competely different things.

[ANDROID_DOES]

Thanks, but I'm well aware of the details. How the words strike you is one thing but Santos fighting sharper and more deadly against Margarito than virtually anyone else he's ever faced adds up to some colorful language.

Fighting like a murderer and murdering or having murdered someone are competely different things.

just like any sport people have there good and bad games/fights. Santos was on that night. Do you think santos wins if they fight next month?

[Addison]

just like any sport people have there good and bad games/fights. Santos was on that night. Do you think santos wins if they fight next month?

Like I was saying.. It's hard to tell with all objectivity. Did or does Santos have Margarito's number? If they fought next month Margarito would likely win because Santos has been extremely innactive, ect.

[ANDROID_DOES]

Like I was saying.. It's hard to tell with all objectivity. Did or does Santos have Margarito's number? If they fought next month Margarito would likely win because Santos has been extremely innactive, ect.

but how can you say santos has his number when he only has one win against margarito. Now throw in it was a technical win due to a head butt stoppage and throw in the fact margarito was winning one card and down by one on another it's hard to say santos has his number soley on that. Margarito could have finished that fight and easily won the fight.

[Addison]

but how can you say santos has his number when he only has one win against margarito. Now throw in it was a technical win due to a head butt stoppage and throw in the fact margarito was winning one card and down by one on another it's hard to say santos has his number soley on that. Margarito could have finished that fight and easily won the fight.

Only because of how easily and masterfully Santos was able to time Margarito - but I agree that he was having a helluva night. I've only said I'm not sure, but the possibility has crossed a few people's minds..

[ANDROID_DOES]

Only because of how easily and masterfully Santos was able to time Margarito - but I agree that he was having a helluva night. I've only said I'm not sure, but the possibility has crossed a few people's minds..

well to solely say he has his number on a technical decision is in my opinion not accurate. If they fought again and it had the same result then yes you can make that argument ala forrest/mosely.