Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Campbell Slams Schaefer, Golden Boy

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by SinatraFan View Post
    I never said Marquez wasn't a big fight. I said Pacquiao is a much bigger fight financially.

    Why do you say there is "no way" Campbell gets a fight with Pacquiao? That would completely contradict this ESPN article.

    http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/box...ory?id=3292237

    "If Pacquiao can defeat Marquez and Diaz this summer, Arum said that the fight in Macau that he would like to do is Pacquiao against Nate Campbell, who upset Juan Diaz to win three belts last Saturday night in Cancun, Mexico."

    Also quoted was Bob Arum.

    "I know it's a tough fight for Manny and there a lot of bridges to cross before then, but if Manny wins and Don and I can make that fight it would be unbelievable. Sure, it's a tough fight for Manny, but so what? When you're fighting for all those belts, it's supposed to be a tough fight."

    Macau Casino in China? Sounds like a lot more money on the table than the Marquez fight. If Bob Arum has already stated verbally that the fight is a real possibility then Campbell has a real shot of landing the fight. Campbell is taking a lot of steam out of GBP by completely circumventing them and The Ring title and fighting for all of the belts on a larger event than GBP could have put together.

    Should Campbell fight Pacquiao, that would be the worst blow to GBP and would discredit the Ring Magazine title.
    i ment he doesnt get it this year. If he would just be patient and get some nice wins he would get pacman. He's trying to get him right now and that's not going to happen.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by rogelio1289 View Post
      i ment he doesnt get it this year. If he would just be patient and get some nice wins he would get pacman. He's trying to get him right now and that's not going to happen.
      Pacquiao has a date in July against David Diaz, then has another in November without an opponent. If Pacquiao has one belt and Campbell has three, obviously Campbell is the most logical opponent.

      But if Campbell happens to be tied up in November, say against someone like Marquez, would that not exclude him? Then guess which promoter strolls along with available guys like Juan Diaz, Michael Katsidis or Casamayor and his Ring Title? Golden Boy Promotions.

      I understand what you are saying about "Campbell isn't a big enough name," but this goes beyond names. This is about validity and holding out for bigger fish. If Campbell can hold onto his belts until November, he will likely get the fight.

      What payback for GBP trying to push Campbell out of they way, no?

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by rogelio1289 View Post
        There is alot of truth to that. If nate was a smart man he would haven't said all that. Sometimes you have to just bite your tongue and hold back your words. In this instance nate might have ****ed his ownself over. That's good to speak your mind say the truth but something about $$$$$$$$$$$ signs tells me i rather stay quite sometimes lol
        but here is the thing

        he could be quiet and let them take the reigns over in what happens at Lightweight. He could stay silent with the proposed Marquez fight.

        but he knows whats going on and I think they didn't expect him to. He knows that by offering him JMM in Nov/Dec he is in effect out of fighting Manny this year if at all. He also knows that if Casa and Diaz fight he is out of that running as well, setting up Golden Boy with options waiting for Manny

        Manny could fight the winner of Casa Diaz
        Manny could fight Katsidis in the interim
        Manny could fight Santa Cruz in the interim

        while I think the next question would be "well wouldnt they freeze JMM out of rematch this year as well" I dont think Manny was going to fight JMM this year regardless.

        Nate just beat GGP to the punch and put all the questions that need answering squarely on the them and Schaefer

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by SinatraFan View Post
          Pacquiao has a date in July against David Diaz, then has another in November without an opponent. If Pacquiao has one belt and Campbell has three, obviously Campbell is the most logical opponent.

          But if Campbell happens to be tied up in November, say against someone like Marquez, would that not exclude him? Then guess which promoter strolls along with available guys like Juan Diaz, Michael Katsidis or Casamayor and his Ring Title? Golden Boy Promotions.

          I understand what you are saying about "Campbell isn't a big enough name," but this goes beyond names. This is about validity and holding out for bigger fish. If Campbell can hold onto his belts until November, he will likely get the fight.

          What payback for GBP trying to push Campbell out of they way, no?
          I see what your saying. I think marquez has a better chance at getting pacquio than campbell. Why not get a fight with marquez beat him and get him out of the picture and put yourself in a position to be the logical front runner for pacman even if its in april of next year. He said he would fight marquez in july that would be great but dont know if it will happen. Campbell is just out of luck kind of. And showing up at press conferences talking **** to people is getting him much respect.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by JR Gonzalez View Post
            marquez beats cambell easily haha cambell sucks so does juan diaz and so does david diaz and so does joel casamayor and so does katsidis...the only good lightweights would be pacquiao and marquez...
            nobody wants to see that **** again! Lets get new fights. not the same ole washed up rivalries that prove nothing. Champions vs champions.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by jantzen212003 View Post
              nobody wants to see that **** again! Lets get new fights. not the same ole washed up rivalries that prove nothing. Champions vs champions.
              you'd be one of the few to say no one wants to see that fight again. It would be a great fight and i would pay to see it again.

              Comment


              • #47
                I've always hated Schaefer and how he talks about fighters, I remember he badmouthed Marquez? about being upset about a decision, he doesn't belong in boxing.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by MikeBrew328 View Post
                  I've always hated Schaefer and how he talks about fighters, I remember he badmouthed Marquez? about being upset about a decision, he doesn't belong in boxing.
                  I think GBP is up to no good!!!

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Campbell is old enough but now he needs to fight some unknown and look pretty bad to set up a fight with Pacquiao. Arum won't take risks with a slick boxer....he needs a come forward fighter who is past his prime.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by SinatraFan View Post
                      Can we get a translation over here?
                      muhaby muchabay muktou!!!better........lol j/j i kind didnt understand it either when i looked at my post sorry .....isaid becarefull what you say cuz you may screw yourself....i think thats what campbel is doing to himself.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP