Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
what if: James Toney vs. Joe Calzaghe @ 168 (Prime for prime)
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by pesticid View PostBut Toney's eaten more leather in a fight than Calzaghe has eaten in his entire career.
A boring fight really.
Man was Toney looking bad. He was gasping for air although he only threw about 300 punches.Last edited by TheGreatA; 05-22-2008, 06:47 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by slicksouthpaw16 View PostYeah, all when he was out of shape. Thats like saying that Sedreck Fields would have still beaten an in shape and prepared Shannon Briggs on his best day. A fastasy match up is when both fighters are at their best, not choosing a fight where he looked his worst. Good job
But.....you can't just excuse Toney's bad performances that occurred during his prime and say they don't count. You can't. Toney handed in those performances so he is that fighter.
Now...I'm not saying that James Toney is a bad fighter at all, he was quality, but I'll take the Calzaghe that beat Kessler over the Toney that beat Barkley absolutely any day of the week. If you're looking for a single performance to show off your fighter's greatness, Joe wins that one hands down. His performance was better and his opposition was better.
Yes...I know prime for prime Barkley > Kessler, but that barkley was shot.
Anyway, they were both good and I like them both, just think Calzaghe was better is all.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by abadger View PostBut.....you can't just excuse Toney's bad performances that occurred during his prime and say they don't count. You can't. Toney handed in those performances so he is that fighter.
Now...I'm not saying that James Toney is a bad fighter at all, he was quality, but I'll take the Calzaghe that beat Kessler over the Toney that beat Barkley absolutely any day of the week. If you're looking for a single performance to show off your fighter's greatness, Joe wins that one hands down. His performance was better and his opposition was better.
Yes...I know prime for prime Barkley > Kessler, but that barkley was shot.
Anyway, they were both good and I like them both, just think Calzaghe was better is all.
Comment
-
Originally posted by abadger View PostBut.....you can't just excuse Toney's bad performances that occurred during his prime and say they don't count. You can't. Toney handed in those performances so he is that fighter.
Now...I'm not saying that James Toney is a bad fighter at all, he was quality, but I'll take the Calzaghe that beat Kessler over the Toney that beat Barkley absolutely any day of the week. If you're looking for a single performance to show off your fighter's greatness, Joe wins that one hands down. His performance was better and his opposition was better.
Yes...I know prime for prime Barkley > Kessler, but that barkley was shot.
Anyway, they were both good and I like them both, just think Calzaghe was better is all.
Comment
-
[quote=abadger;3520177]Joe wins that one hands down. His performance was better and his opposition was better.
QUOTE]
HUH?
Comment
-
[QUOTE=slicksouthpaw16;3520235]Originally posted by abadger View PostJoe wins that one hands down. His performance was better and his opposition was better.
QUOTE]
HUH?
Joe v Kessler > Toney v Barkley IMO
Barkley was shot, and Joe's performance was better than Toney's. I think so anyway. It was an awesome display of both defensive and offensive excellence.
Comment
Comment