Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who will win Mayweather vs Cotto?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I'm not sure how throttling a guy you already ****ed up makes you any more legit.

    Mayweather beat Hatton at 147 when Ricky was not the champion of the division, he had given up his belt that he won from Luis Collazo. The same with Judah (and please for the love of god, and your own credibility, don't mention the IBF belt that Judah still somehow held), who was no longer a champion.

    Mayweather gets no credit for beating Jesus Chavez because he wasn't a champion at the time? What about Corrales who didn't hold a belt at that point?

    All of these non-champions did nothing to solidy how great he was? Clearly they did, and the same is true for Cotto, he beat Quintana about as convincingly as you can ask for, and you are saying it doesn't count, because Quintana didn't have a belt at the time.

    I just don't get what you mean Horus.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by vladimir303 View Post
      You make it seem like Cotto needs to jump through hoops to get a shot at Floyd. Which is it? The financial aspect of you thinking that Hatton is a bigger draw then Cotto and that Cotto's PPV numbers are low OR him not being great??

      You make it seem like Floyd is worlds above everybody and that there needs to be a 30 fighters Royal Rumble to determine a worthy challanger to Floyd's throne to fight him at BoxingMania or something.

      I defend Floyd but you overanalyze things way too much. Make up your mind what you expect of Cotto to do.
      THAT is why you are the best Mayweather fan poster on here.

      *round of applause*

      Comment


      • Originally posted by vladimir303 View Post
        You make it seem like Cotto needs to jump through hoops to get a shot at Floyd. Which is it? The financial aspect of you thinking that Hatton is a bigger draw then Cotto and that Cotto's PPV numbers are low OR him not being great??

        You make it seem like Floyd is worlds above everybody and that there needs to be a 30 fighters Royal Rumble to determine a worthy challanger to Floyd's throne at BoxingMania or something.

        I defend Floyd but you overanalyze things way too much. Make up your mind what you expect of Cotto to do.
        Obvious you always try to undermined me for some reason....I dont know..
        Financial reason are obivous...

        But Floyd always already said he is only fighting for legacy and money...

        And if Floyd Beats Cotto right now, with Cotto only having won a belt by winning it in a vacant match...

        What does that do for Floyd Legacy...??




        You can focus on the financial
        I will focus on the Legecy

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Horus View Post
          Obvious you always try to undermined me for some reason....I dont know..
          Financial reason are obivous...

          But Floyd always already said he is only fighting for legacy and money...

          And if Floyd Beats Cotto right now, with Cotto only having won a belt by winning it in a vacant match...

          What does that do for Floyd Legacy...??




          You can focus on the financial
          I will focus on the Legecy
          Just because Cotto won a vacant belt doesn't make the belt less legit.

          Don't you think the defenses he has successfully completed would make that belt legitimate?

          A win over Sugar Shane Mosley means more to me than a win over Carlos Quintana at this point... or are you claiming that beating Quintana in his next fight would be a bigger win for Cotto than his win over Shane Mosley?

          Another example: If he beats Margarito this summer, who would have to relinquish his IBF belt to fight Cotto, does that take away from that win? Would he have to fight the winner of the IBF vacant title fight in order to legitimize his win over Antonio Margarito?

          Comment


          • Originally posted by DWiens421 View Post
            I'm not sure how throttling a guy you already ****ed up makes you any more legit.

            Mayweather beat Hatton at 147 when Ricky was not the champion of the division, he had given up his belt that he won from Luis Collazo. The same with Judah (and please for the love of god, and your own credibility, don't mention the IBF belt that Judah still somehow held), who was no longer a champion.

            Mayweather gets no credit for beating Jesus Chavez because he wasn't a champion at the time? What about Corrales who didn't hold a belt at that point?

            All of these non-champions did nothing to solidy how great he was? Clearly they did, and the same is true for Cotto, he beat Quintana about as convincingly as you can ask for, and you are saying it doesn't count, because Quintana didn't have a belt at the time.

            I just don't get what you mean Horus.
            i think he is trying to say cotto won a vacant title, the same title that was vacated because Baldomir did not pay sancationing fees to the WBA when he won the title.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Xplosivo View Post
              i think he is trying to say cotto won a vacant title, the same title that was vacated because Baldomir did not pay sancationing fees to the WBA when he won the title.
              Well even so... a vacated title should not always have an asterisk by it. Defenses of that title can make it legitimate.

              Or maybe not... in that case the whole 168 division will always be terrible, filled with fake champions who will always hold a belt that was once won after Calzaghe vacated it.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by DWiens421 View Post
                I'm not sure how throttling a guy you already ****ed up makes you any more legit.

                Mayweather beat Hatton at 147 when Ricky was not the champion of the division, he had given up his belt that he won from Luis Collazo. The same with Judah (and please for the love of god, and your own credibility, don't mention the IBF belt that Judah still somehow held), who was no longer a champion.

                Mayweather gets no credit for beating Jesus Chavez because he wasn't a champion at the time? What about Corrales who didn't hold a belt at that point?

                All of these non-champions did nothing to solidy how great he was? Clearly they did, and the same is true for Cotto, he beat Quintana about as convincingly as you can ask for, and you are saying it doesn't count, because Quintana didn't have a belt at the time.

                I just don't get what you mean Horus.

                We live in era of boxing where every fighter floyd fights and win gets discredit...right after for not being whatever they consider a marker of success... we all understand that..

                and seeing how The Hatton Fight was discredited.....because Hatton wasnt a WW champion, or wasnt big enough, or whatever the reason may be...

                I look at Cotto and see what the excuses and argument will be when Floyd beats him...!!

                I see people saying he never fought a young, prime, active, p4p fighter before he fought floyd

                I see people saying he only won his titles by fighting in Vacant matches

                I see people saying well Cotto was never highly ranked in the P4P list anyways So this win is not that impressive.....

                and some of those arguments are valid...And I see it happening as soon as Floyd wins...



                So a quick way to get rid of all those arguments

                is for Cotto to get those other two belts.....
                And solidify himself as a great fighter before he fought Floyd...

                Not becoming a great fighter if he beats floyd...

                That's my point..!

                Comment


                • Originally posted by NAPO View Post
                  keep making a fool of urself..u are getting worse everytime.
                  He's not getting Floyd's attention by fighting Gomez in a Title fight..

                  Those ratings were down the toilet..

                  Cotto should follow Oscar and Floyd's example and LEAVE TOP RANK..!


                  You should be glad Floyd hasn't fought Cotto..

                  There would be no one left for you to shake your pom poms and cheer for..

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Xplosivo View Post
                    i think he is trying to say cotto won a vacant title, the same title that was vacated because Baldomir did not pay sancationing fees to the WBA when he won the title.
                    But if they are all vacant title that Baldomir vacated and they're all meanless and since Floyd is the REAL CHAMPION beating Baldomir wouldn't all those belts be meanless now.

                    He is saying that he wants Cotto to unify against Quintana and Margarito. But aren't those belts still meaningless and isn't fighting Mayweather the only way of winning the REAL TITLE.

                    Why ask Cotto to unify those belts if they're meaningless in the first place.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Bad_Barracuda View Post
                      He's not getting Floyd's attention by fighting Gomez in a Title fight..

                      Those ratings were down the toilet..

                      Cotto should follow Oscar and Floyd's example and LEAVE TOP RANK..!


                      You should be glad Floyd hasn't fought Cotto..

                      There would be no one left for you to shake your pom poms and cheer for..

                      who the **** r u?? let me guess one of floyd's *****s??? **** off.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP