Who should Sam Peter's voluntary opponent be?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mike06j770
    Gettin Money Since '86
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2007
    • 1267
    • 44
    • 6
    • 7,918

    #31
    i think it should be mike tyson...why not?

    Comment

    • Jim Jeffries
      rugged individualist
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2007
      • 20740
      • 1,376
      • 2,868
      • 54,838

      #32
      David Haye, let's see how good his chin is, or how his power carries to HW.

      Comment

      • Scott9945
        Gonna be more su****ious
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Mar 2007
        • 22032
        • 741
        • 1,371
        • 30,075

        #33
        Originally posted by duffgun
        Peter would never fight Virchis or Dimitrenko cause they might beat him he will fight briggs because he has looked so bad, it shows no drive on behalf of the champ.

        You're right. I think people are missing the point of "voluntary". The idea is to find an opponent that is either going to make you a lot of money, or not be much of a threat to beat you.

        Comment

        • Clegg
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Mar 2008
          • 24673
          • 3,726
          • 2,307
          • 233,274

          #34
          Rid**** Bowe

          Comment

          • Boogie Nights
            i kill 2 make the bill
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2007
            • 3738
            • 174
            • 173
            • 11,594

            #35
            Originally posted by silencers98
            Briggs has become way too muscle bound, I don't know why he put on so much muscle for because his stamina already ****** because of his asthma, putting on so much muscle just made all that worse.
            he may not have neccesairly wanted to put on all that muscle. if you look at the begining of his career he was very trim.
            the result of all that weight is steroids. he takes them for his asthma so for him they're legal

            Comment

            • Silencers
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2006
              • 21957
              • 505
              • 235
              • 32,983

              #36
              Originally posted by boxing_prospect
              he may not have neccesairly wanted to put on all that muscle. if you look at the begining of his career he was very trim.
              the result of all that weight is steroids. he takes them for his asthma so for him they're legal
              But he has had asthma since he was a kid, wouldn't he have been taking steroids back when he was trim as well, if they were legal?

              Comment

              • Boogie Nights
                i kill 2 make the bill
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jul 2007
                • 3738
                • 174
                • 173
                • 11,594

                #37
                i wouldnt mind seeing david tua get a shot. true he's been fighting bums, but at least he's been active. how is golota more deserving of getting a shot at this point anymore than tua is. besides with tua at least it will be exciting, 2 ****ers, this fight will gurantee a knockout. arreola seems to be a good option, but he needs more figths, golota and tua are obviously more experienced than him and would deserve an opportunity more than he does. he has yet to beat someone of notice. povetkin will fight klitschko after thompson so there's no need to rush him further.

                give tua a shot

                Comment

                • Boogie Nights
                  i kill 2 make the bill
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jul 2007
                  • 3738
                  • 174
                  • 173
                  • 11,594

                  #38
                  Originally posted by silencers98
                  But he has had asthma since he was a kid, wouldn't he have been taking steroids back when he was trim as well, if they were legal?
                  that's a good point, perhaps yes, but im not sure about what he did in the past.
                  i know a while ago i read an interview with him, when he told eric raskin (writer for ring magazine) that he's taking steroids for his asthma. im not sure what type of steroid it was, but he's definetly juiced.

                  Comment

                  • Boogie Nights
                    i kill 2 make the bill
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jul 2007
                    • 3738
                    • 174
                    • 173
                    • 11,594

                    #39
                    http://www.thesweetscience.com/boxin...s-steroid-use/

                    here's a link, it's brief but he admits to it.

                    Comment

                    • Silencers
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • May 2006
                      • 21957
                      • 505
                      • 235
                      • 32,983

                      #40
                      Originally posted by boxing_prospect
                      http://www.thesweetscience.com/boxin...s-steroid-use/

                      here's a link, it's brief but he admits to it.
                      Thanks for the link, it's the not performance enhancing kind of steroids though, that leads me to think that he put on the muscle voluntarily.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP