Literally, by arguing against you, and if Cotto ends up beating Mayweather, they will have conceded that it was not a fluke.
Rather than by agreeing with you, which indicates that Cotto only can win IF he has Mayweather's number, like so many other fighters who were thought to be inferior, who got win after win against a guy who was deemed superior (Barkley over Hearns anyone?), now they have indirectly conceded that Cotto is a better fighter, is a better athlete or has a style that is poison to Floyd Mayweather. None of those can really be labeled as a fluke win either.
Always fun to watch people shoot themselves in the foot.
Rather than by agreeing with you, which indicates that Cotto only can win IF he has Mayweather's number, like so many other fighters who were thought to be inferior, who got win after win against a guy who was deemed superior (Barkley over Hearns anyone?), now they have indirectly conceded that Cotto is a better fighter, is a better athlete or has a style that is poison to Floyd Mayweather. None of those can really be labeled as a fluke win either.
Always fun to watch people shoot themselves in the foot.
.....
Comment