Ricky US con claim...

[Clegg]

Hatton wasn't allowed to cheat so now he is complaining about it. When your locked up it's the refs job to break it up, its not a wrestling match. Hes got so used to being allowed tyo use his *****wet cheating holding style that as soon as he isn't allowed to do it he thinks the ref cost him the fight. It doesn't say much for your talent when you need the ref to let you cheat to be able to win.

No, I think if you actually read the comments that have been made you'll see that it was the incorrect point deduction and the leniency towards elbows, forearms and other infringements by Mayweather that were criticised.

How many marks do you give the referee out of 10 for his performance that night?

You think charging in and holding your opponent is going for the KO?

Have a quick watch of the knockdown; Hatton comes forward with a left, while his right arm moves back to throw a big right, and this leaves him wide open to the Mayweather shot.

[Clegg]

MEN was his fortress and like Paulie M says NOBODY gets a decision in there NOBODY.[/I][/B]

I cannot think of a single decision that Hatton was given in Manchester that he didn't deserve. Which ones do you and Paulie have in mind?

[Ray*]

I cannot think of a single decision that Hatton was given in Manchester that he didn't deserve. Which ones do you and Paulie have in mind?

I dont doubt ANY hatton victory at the MEN arena of course not, But i agree with Paulie M in him saying if a fight between those two goes to the scorecard NO way he, mayweather or anyone else gets the decision in the MEN arena.

[Nicky_Hatton]

Floyd beats Hatton 9/10 times, but that doesnt take away from the fact that Joe Cortez was indeed biased that night. Floyd elbowed, and ducked below waist-line all night, and yet he takes a point away from Hatton for a rabbit punch that didnt even connect.

Agree with that. Maybe not 9/10 times though :-P

[Clegg]

I dont doubt ANY hatton victory at the MEN arena of course not, But i agree with Paulie M in him saying if a fight between those two goes to the scorecard NO way he, mayweather or anyone else gets the decision in the MEN arena.

I don't agree, but at the same time I accept that you have a point in that it's not completely fair. I think that when it's a UK boxer vs a US boxer the referee should be from a neutral location.

[ROSS CALIFORNIA]

He would have had more of a chance in Manchester.

But the fact that he lost his head just goes to show that he could never beat Floyd anyway. Floyd would never lose his head. Ricky is way to emotional.

Floyd is better anyway.

Your from England and you made this statement? Damn, I'm shocked. I give you props.

[Nicky_Hatton]

Hatton is ****.

Where's my props?

[squealpiggy]

Why squealpiggy?

Did you squeal like a pig when you where born?

Your mother squealed like a pig last night. And you're out of orange juice.

i agree with Paulie M in him saying if a fight between those two goes to the scorecard NO way he, mayweather or anyone else gets the decision in the MEN arena.

I don't think it's entirely fair to jump to that conclusion. There has never been a Hatton fight at the MEN where the result was in doubt.

[Clegg]

Your from England and you made this statement? Damn, I'm shocked. I give you props.

Lots of British boxing fans predicted that Hatton would lose. It's just that a lot of people who don't watch much boxing became Hatton supporters and thought that they were experts on the sport because they'd seen a few highlight videos on youtube. Most British boxing fans accept that Floyd is the most talented fighter in the world.

[sterling]

all things aside hatton stil lost he proberly would of lost anyway without the dum ref