Is Pacquiao Your #1 P4P if he Beats JMM?

[wmute]

because floyd is ****ing boring as ****. unbeatable why? he hasn't fought a good fighter. pacquiao fought barrera,morales, marquez last time in a 1 year period all those greatest mexicans in the division. who the **** mayweather fought in his division? non. nuff said.

I'll just keep on reposting a few facts for those who seem unable to separate them from their imagination... by re-pasting my first post:

LOL I will think about it when he fights a true, unbeaten jr. lightweight, possibly under 30 years old.

Marquez is a 34 years old featherweight.

Barrera was a 33 years old featherweight with 68 pro fights and coming off a loss.

Solis was featherweight (in his prime too! but a nobody unfortunately)

Larios was a superbantamweight coming off a loss.

Morales was a featherweight coming off a lot of losses. In fact Morales only managed to beat Pac in the last 3-4 years.

Velazquez was a featherweight.

Imagine if this was Mayweather's record the bashing that would be going on

[Mad Classic]

Just wanted to add that Pacquiao is the ****ing man. He's #1 P4P in my book right now.

[MayweatherJr.]

I'll just keep on reposting a few facts for those who seem unable to separate them from their imagination... by re-pasting my first post:

LOL I will think about it when he fights a true, unbeaten jr. lightweight, possibly under 30 years old.

Marquez is a 34 years old featherweight.

Barrera was a 33 years old featherweight with 68 pro fights and coming off a loss.

Solis was featherweight (in his prime too! but a nobody unfortunately)

Larios was a superbantamweight coming off a loss.

Morales was a featherweight coming off a lot of losses. In fact Morales only managed to beat Pac in the last 3-4 years.

Velazquez was a featherweight.

Imagine if this was Mayweather's record the bashing that would be going on

Dude give the guy some slack. Those fighters he beat were natural featherweights and he was a flyweight and he did beat barrera in his prime and nobody gave him a chance in the morales rematch and he beat him by tko. Look I think he's a great fighter but floyd is just a level above him.

[wmute]

Those above post has nothing to do with Pac's greatness in boxing because Pac already achieved it when he fought Barrera the first time who considered by many as top 3 p4p. Read my previous post. Those other Pac achievement recently were only icing of the cake on his boxing career. May I remind you also that Pac started at 106 and had 3 losses on his career bu it did not matter to him as what we can see where he is now.

The above post has something to do with pac current p4p standing.

Ray Leonard beat Marving Hagler 20 years ago, is still p4p number one?

May I remind you that Pacman fought at 106 at age 16. Guess what National Golden Gloves did Mayweather win at age 16? That's right 106

Pacman is an excellent fighter, but Mayweather is simply on a different level.

[.::|ULTIMATE|::.]

I'll just keep on posting a few facts by pasting my first post:

LOL I will think about it when he fights a true, unbeaten jr. lightweight, possibly under 30 years old.

Marquez is a 34 years old featherweight.

Barrera was a 33 years old featherweight with 68 pro fights and coming off a loss.

Solis was featherweight (in his prime too! but a nobody unfortunately)

Larios was a superbantamweight coming off a loss.

Morales was a featherweight coming off a lot of losses. In fact Morales only managed to beat Pac in the last 3-4 years.

Velazquez was a featherweight.

Imagine if this was Mayweather's record the bashing that would be going on

I am not saying he is my #1 just that he is over PBF so if u got PBF at #1 Pac should be #1. Floyd hasn't fought no one except ricky hatton who i never regarded as that good anyway. Besides him they've all either been old, or semi-retired super stars, or come of losses. 2002 is the last good fight for Floyd imo. That all in all is the jist of what I am saying hehe.

[Mad Classic]

It's arguable if Floyd is "above" him. Floyd might be, but he has yet to test himself truly, against the best. He also hand picks opponents and fights with a business mindset that is usually safe = boring.

[wmute]

Dude give the guy some slack. Those fighters he beat were natural featherweights and he was a flyweight and he did beat barrera in his prime and nobody gave him a chance in the morales rematch and he beat him by tko. Look I think he's a great fighter but floyd is just a level above him.

That's exactly what I typed in the post after that, ”excellent but on Mayweather's level.“

As for Pacman being a flyweight, I think most people are either ignorant or deliberately biased on the subject. After Pacman lost the title on the scales, he moved up in weight not 1, not 2 but 3 (THREE) divisions to superbantam, and he was what 20?22?. So ”pacman is a flyweight“ is a bit of myth.

Or take the poster who wanted to remind me how pacman started at 106... completely omitting that he turned pro at age 16 as it's often the case in most 3rd world countries.

[wmute]

I am not saying he is my #1 just that he is over PBF so if u got PBF at #1 Pac should be #1. Floyd hasn't fought no one except ricky hatton who i never regarded as that good anyway. Besides him they've all either been old, or semi-retired super stars, or come of losses. 2002 is the last good fight for Floyd imo. That all in all is the jist of what I am saying hehe.

Pac's opponents are usually BOTH old and coming off losses at the same time

and the last good fight pac had (and won) was in 2003?

who's your p4p #1? JC?

[wmute]

It's arguable if Floyd is "above" him. Floyd might be, but he has yet to test himself truly, against the best. He also hand picks opponents and fights with a business mindset that is usually safe = boring.

Oh really? Whereas Pacman choice of opposition screams courage to the world right? Do I have to paste the list of old featherweights coming off losses again or did you read it?

[MayweatherJr.]

That's exactly what I typed in the post after that, ”excellent but on Mayweather's level.“

As for Pacman being a flyweight, I think most people are either ignorant or deliberately biased on the subject. After Pacman lost the title on the scales, he moved up in weight not 1, not 2 but 3 (THREE) divisions to superbantam, and he was what 20?22?. So ”pacman is a flyweight“ is a bit of myth.

Or take the poster who wanted to remind me how pacman started at 106... completely omitting that he turned pro at age 16 as it's often the case in most 3rd world countries.

LOL! Infairness to him, he did fight in the flyweight division. I'm trying to be fair as I can be but like I said the only way I can put him above floyd is if pacquiao beats marquez and floyd losses in his next fight.