Who was the most technically sound boxer to lace up gloves?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • -Hyperion-
    The Best And Fastest Ride
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Apr 2006
    • 14176
    • 912
    • 1,378
    • 35,380

    #21
    Ricardo Lopez....I like Donald Curry as well, he looked basic as **** and was still great...

    Right now, its Cristian Mijares....that guy is ****ing awesome...

    Comment

    • Pugilistic™
      MV3
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Nov 2006
      • 9848
      • 324
      • 305
      • 16,773

      #22
      Ray Robinson
      Floyd Mayweather Jr
      Bernard Hopkins

      Comment

      • riza
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Nov 2005
        • 779
        • 61
        • 54
        • 7,084

        #23
        Originally posted by danny stash
        I like this assessment if you throw in Winky
        winky is to basic for me. hes obviously good at what he does but doesnt have a wide enough range of skills.

        Comment

        • shawn_
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2007
          • 1578
          • 94
          • 23
          • 1,794

          #24
          There is only one answer. Ricardo Lopez.

          Comment

          • revs1227
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jul 2007
            • 8040
            • 255
            • 279
            • 15,341

            #25
            of our generation id have 2 say ronald WINKY wright ...im not 2 familiar with the older guys but def witaker ray robinson

            Comment

            • 215Chaingang
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Feb 2008
              • 510
              • 21
              • 0
              • 6,581

              #26
              winky is to basic for me. hes obviously good at what he does but doesnt have a wide enough range of skills.
              i think the same thing

              Comment

              • Ryn0
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Feb 2007
                • 11139
                • 310
                • 269
                • 20,767

                #27
                Originally posted by Queensdawg
                I'm not talking about handspeed, athlecism, or anything like that.. Who was the most technically sound boxer to lace up a pair of gloves?

                I have to say, just pure boxing skills, it's Pernell Whitaker. He did have fast hands but he just boxed circles around his opponents.
                Ray Robinson, Pernell was a great DEFENSIVE boxer but his activity level was low and his flashy moves didnt impress the judges which is why he lost a lot of big fights even if he was robbed.

                Comment

                • 215Chaingang
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 510
                  • 21
                  • 0
                  • 6,581

                  #28
                  Ray Robinson, Pernell was a great DEFENSIVE boxer but his activity level was low and his flashy moves didnt impress the judges which is why he lost a lot of big fights even if he was robbed.
                  true but why is that you win off of activity if you are not actually doing anything?

                  Comment

                  • P4PKING_2008
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Aug 2007
                    • 4359
                    • 639
                    • 323
                    • 6,304

                    #29
                    Toss up between Floyd and Winky.

                    Comment

                    • Ryn0
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Feb 2007
                      • 11139
                      • 310
                      • 269
                      • 20,767

                      #30
                      Originally posted by 215Chaingang
                      true but why is that you win off of activity if you are not actually doing anything?
                      exactly thats what im saying, it might have impressed the crowds but not the judges. He lost because he wasnt active enough they saw past his moves and say that he wasn't actaully throwing, at least the opponent was throwing.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP