Tweet
hold up hold up don't make it seem like I don't like Floyd, I'm talking Boxing here yo and some fights would have been better than others but I have nothing but the utmost love and respect for Floyd it's just I don't like a lot of what I'm hearing my damn self..
you could question Cotto fighting Gomez all you want but you know what then I could name up some names that weren't on Floyd's level too, you see the hipocrasy? like when I say it about Cotto then I'm dissing Floyd when Floyd did the same exact **** too.
you made it into this whole argument when all I said was Floyd didn't fight ALL of the TOP guys in those divisions, he fought a respectable amount, enough to credit him for a while and yes as the pound for pound best but he didn't fight them ALL which was my ONLY argument at first..
then I bring Cotto into the mix and say how I feel Cotto just moved up and up and up in class while Floyd hasn't in his last 3 (including the ODLH rematch) ya feel me, how Shane was a better fighter than Oscar and Cotto get's ****ted on for winning a Unanimous decision against someone in Shane who was beating good opposition and was at his better weight and still had more left than Oscar while Floyd gets praised for his SPLIT Decision against Oscar who lost to Shane twice, was battle scarred by bigger men and was just overall not the same and had lost 2 of 5 and wasn't pound for pound best since 2003, you get the hipcoritical **** I'm talking about now?
and as for your Naz comment, so what because Floyd couldn't get Naz he just bounces and gets out of dodge like that? Naz probably lost to Barrera but then Barrera came up so why not fight him? ya see you trying to defend Mayweather and I ain't trying to defend Cotto yet you accuse me of that when really YOU defending Floyd, I'm saying what he did, these are facts and I ain't saying he ain't the best I'm just saying he didn't fight ALL of the TOP guys in those weights which is true like it or not.
you could question Cotto fighting Gomez all you want but you know what then I could name up some names that weren't on Floyd's level too, you see the hipocrasy? like when I say it about Cotto then I'm dissing Floyd when Floyd did the same exact **** too.
you made it into this whole argument when all I said was Floyd didn't fight ALL of the TOP guys in those divisions, he fought a respectable amount, enough to credit him for a while and yes as the pound for pound best but he didn't fight them ALL which was my ONLY argument at first..
then I bring Cotto into the mix and say how I feel Cotto just moved up and up and up in class while Floyd hasn't in his last 3 (including the ODLH rematch) ya feel me, how Shane was a better fighter than Oscar and Cotto get's ****ted on for winning a Unanimous decision against someone in Shane who was beating good opposition and was at his better weight and still had more left than Oscar while Floyd gets praised for his SPLIT Decision against Oscar who lost to Shane twice, was battle scarred by bigger men and was just overall not the same and had lost 2 of 5 and wasn't pound for pound best since 2003, you get the hipcoritical **** I'm talking about now?
and as for your Naz comment, so what because Floyd couldn't get Naz he just bounces and gets out of dodge like that? Naz probably lost to Barrera but then Barrera came up so why not fight him? ya see you trying to defend Mayweather and I ain't trying to defend Cotto yet you accuse me of that when really YOU defending Floyd, I'm saying what he did, these are facts and I ain't saying he ain't the best I'm just saying he didn't fight ALL of the TOP guys in those weights which is true like it or not.
Comment