What has Bert Sugar done for boxing?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mr. Ryan
    Guest
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2004
    • 23429
    • 1,301
    • 1,089
    • 29,664

    #31
    I just want one of the Sugar haters to step forward and declare that they know more on boxing than Bert Sugar. Then I will proceed to LOL until I'm ROFLMFAO at the self-PWNage.

    Comment

    • sterling
      P4P Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2007
      • 4845
      • 183
      • 37
      • 16,637

      #32
      hes a very well known historian maybe the best?

      Comment

      • Mr. Ryan
        Guest
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Mar 2004
        • 23429
        • 1,301
        • 1,089
        • 29,664

        #33
        Originally posted by 2501
        gotta love it when i see posters/fans thinkin they know more than judges/refs/analysts/writers.
        There are some posters (wmute, yogi) that know more than a lot of upstart journalists. I would never put myself in the same category as a more experienced writer whose typewriter I couldn't carry. I'd like to think that being close to the action has given me a better understanding, but just because I'm a writer that doesn't make me Bert Sugar. That takes time and maturity. You can't look at a piece of information once and appreciate it. You have to look back 5 years at what you said and correct it, then you understand better.

        Guys like Thomas Gerbasi, Bert Sugar, Larry Merchant, they are special.

        There are a lot of posters here that know more about boxing than ESB writers.

        Comment

        • Scott9945
          Gonna be more su****ious
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Mar 2007
          • 22032
          • 741
          • 1,371
          • 30,075

          #34
          Originally posted by Asian Sensation
          I just want one of the Sugar haters to step forward and declare that they know more on boxing than Bert Sugar. Then I will proceed to LOL until I'm ROFLMFAO at the self-PWNage.

          Sugar is very knowledgable and an outstanding boxing writer, and I'm not saying I know more than him. That doesn't mean everything he says is gold. He tells some great boxing stories, but IMO he enhances many them over time. Sugar said after the first Lewis-Holyfield fight that Lennox didn't deserve the decision. When they had that three hour special with Lewis sitting next to him it was an entirely different story. I heard Sugar say how much better the heavyweights of the 70's were compared to those of today. No doubt. But then he lists name including Earnie Shavers and Jerry Quarry who would beat any of todays champions. Sorry, but I don't buy a 6'0 Quarry or Shavers lasting very long against Wladimir Klitschko. If you look at some of the opponents they lost to it's difficult to argue that point. Somehow I get the feeling that if he is around in 20 years, he'll be spinning the same song about the heavyweights of this decade.

          Comment

          • Mr. Ryan
            Guest
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Mar 2004
            • 23429
            • 1,301
            • 1,089
            • 29,664

            #35
            Originally posted by Scott9945
            Sugar is very knowledgable and an outstanding boxing writer, and I'm not saying I know more than him. That doesn't mean everything he says is gold. He tells some great boxing stories, but IMO he enhances many them over time. Sugar said after the first Lewis-Holyfield fight that Lennox didn't deserve the decision. When they had that three hour special with Lewis sitting next to him it was an entirely different story. I heard Sugar say how much better the heavyweights of the 70's were compared to those of today. No doubt. But then he lists name including Earnie Shavers and Jerry Quarry who would beat any of todays champions. Sorry, but I don't buy a 6'0 Quarry or Shavers lasting very long against Wladimir Klitschko. If you look at some of the opponents they lost to it's difficult to argue that point. Somehow I get the feeling that if he is around in 20 years, he'll be spinning the same song about the heavyweights of this decade.
            He is partial to fighters of his generation, but who isn't? Ask your Dad who'd win, Frazier or Lennox Lewis. I bet he picks Frazier.

            If Shavers or Quarrey hit Wladimir, Wladimir would be looking up at the stars. It's a matter of opinion and maybe he just finds certain intangibles present in that generation that he perceives to be lacking in others.

            But the Holyfield-Lewis I comment, there's no way to debate IMO that Lewis didn't win. Though Lewis could've done more...

            Comment

            • Scott9945
              Gonna be more su****ious
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Mar 2007
              • 22032
              • 741
              • 1,371
              • 30,075

              #36
              Originally posted by Asian Sensation
              He is partial to fighters of his generation, but who isn't? Ask your Dad who'd win, Frazier or Lennox Lewis. I bet he picks Frazier.

              If Shavers or Quarrey hit Wladimir, Wladimir would be looking up at the stars. It's a matter of opinion and maybe he just finds certain intangibles present in that generation that he perceives to be lacking in others.

              But the Holyfield-Lewis I comment, there's no way to debate IMO that Lewis didn't win. Though Lewis could've done more...

              My father (who is deceased) probably would say something like that, but he was just a casual fan at best. Bert Sugar is a boxing expert, and to me part of that criteria is not lapsing into sentiment. I'm not partial to the now fighters because of my age. As a matter of fact I am old enough to remember watching Quarry fight Shavers on closed circuit TV. While they had the raw power to KO Wlad, I don't think they would ever get close enough. I recognize that Klitschko's jab would make dogmeat out of their faces. It is important to keep any sport's history in the right context. To me when Sugar says that it is as ridiculous as picking the 1972 Dolphins to beat the 2007 Patriots. As for the Lewis-Holy comment, it bothers me more that he changed his tune for the benefit of Lennox than his absurd scoring of the fight. The message that sends to me is "disingenous".

              Comment

              • Fox McCloud
                Mission Complete!
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Apr 2007
                • 18176
                • 789
                • 1,151
                • 26,037

                #37
                I can't believe that you all are talking **** on Sugar.

                I mean, to be honest... he's an extremely upgraded version of Larry Merchant.

                He is one of the few people who can actually comment on a fantasy match between Mayweather Jr. vs. Robinson.

                He has written a lot of important material on boxing.

                And you all say just because he didn't fight or train, he doesn't belong in the HOF? Absurd.

                Comment

                • TintaBoricua
                  Waiting on MvC4...
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Oct 2007
                  • 3455
                  • 509
                  • 176
                  • 9,466

                  #38
                  Originally posted by DWiens421
                  I can't believe that you all are talking **** on Sugar.

                  I mean, to be honest... he's an extremely upgraded version of Larry Merchant.

                  He is one of the few people who can actually comment on a fantasy match between Mayweather Jr. vs. Robinson.
                  He has written a lot of important material on boxing.

                  And you all say just because he didn't fight or train, he doesn't belong in the HOF? Absurd.
                  FACT. LOL

                  And I can't believe that the topic had to get to 3 pages before somebody added that other people besides fighters can be inducted into the HOF. All it takes is info on the web and you'll find that the guy has dedicated a big part of his life on boxing. He's been long around to see a multiple generations of fighters...

                  If anyone can have a legitimate say regarding who could beat who, his opinion would really outweigh most of the people on this board. WTF, jeez. Too bad a lot of people hate him for some reason.

                  Comment

                  • Tyson Jones
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Feb 2007
                    • 1333
                    • 36
                    • 1
                    • 1,570

                    #39
                    He's knowledgable but he acts like his oppinion is the only one that really matters.

                    Comment

                    • Vladimir303
                      303
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • May 2007
                      • 6067
                      • 398
                      • 276
                      • 12,727

                      #40
                      Originally posted by TheManchine

                      Sugar vs Gerry Cooney


                      I like this document he made of Jerry Quarry.
                      New School Vs Old School. Time to pass the torch.......old man.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP