Should Floyd be stripped of his WW title/s?

[deevel79]

Maybe you should answer my post(s)...

Since you called for us to defend it, yet you are wasting your time trying to get other people to answer.

Just because Ricky was given the decision, doesnt mean he won the fight. In my eyes, and in the eyes of many other fans, he did not win a title at 147 already. As for your comparison to Bhop defending against Oscar....Oscar's physique was more suited for 154, than Hattons is for 147. Its obvious that Hatton is NOT a better fighter at 147, than he is at 140. Why do u think he went back down. Oscar on the other hand has never fought again under 154. Answer this. Floyd has publically stated that he has no interest in fighting any WW's. Should he still be able to hold on to the titles, even though he has no intentions of facing another WW?

[THE REED]

that's my point.....floyd should be stripped from the WBC for fighting oscar in september

NO. He shouldnt. Because I bet you anything. Oscar will be coming to 147 to fight for Floyds belt this time. THat is also called, "defending".

[VERSION1 (V1)]

that's my point.....floyd should be stripped from the WBC for fighting oscar in september

if it not for the title then yes but if he defending it then no

[FloydFanatic]

..........

yeah boy thats how we do. their hate is crazy and makes them look dumb.
if floyd should be stripped than cotto should for fighting alfonso and williams for not fighting anybody. floyd has the best resume out of all of them his title is there to stay

[deevel79]

NO. He shouldnt. Because I bet you anything. Oscar will be coming to 147 to fight for Floyds belt this time. THat is also called, "defending".

Oscar is NOT making 147! If so, Floyd would be fighting a weight-drained, weakened Oscar.

[deevel79]

yeah boy thats how we do. their hate is crazy and makes them look dumb.
if floyd should be stripped than cotto should for fighting alfonso and williams for not fighting anybody. floyd has the best resume out of all of them his title is there to stay

Im convinced that you have a Floyd shrine in your bedroom. Does mommy blow out the candles after u fall asleep praying to it?

[Fox McCloud]

Just because Ricky was given the decision, doesnt mean he won the fight. In my eyes, and in the eyes of many other fans, he did not win a title at 147 already. As for your comparison to Bhop defending against Oscar....Oscar's physique was more suited for 154, than Hattons is for 147. Its obvious that Hatton is NOT a better fighter at 147, than he is at 140. Why do u think he went back down. Oscar on the other hand has never fought again under 154. Answer this. Floyd has publically stated that he has no interest in fighting any WW's. Should he still be able to hold on to the titles, even though he has no intentions of facing another WW?

Oscar didn't fight B-Hop at 154 though... He fought him at 160. His win over Sturm was questionable too. Basically Hopkins fighting De La Hoya is a carbon copy of Mayweather fighting Hatton, except Hatton had never lost and was P4P ranked.

If you phrased it by a futuristic refusal to defend his title, then yes he should be stripped, but this, "He hasn't defended it since he won" is ridiculous.

[THE REED]

Oscar is NOT making 147! If so, Floyd would be fighting a weight-drained, weakened Oscar.

Yes, he will.. the first fight was for Oscars belt. Oscar doesnt have a belt anymore. This time he will fight for Floyds belt.

[FloydFanatic]

Im convinced that you have a Floyd shrine in your bedroom. Does mommy blow out the candles after u fall asleep praying to it?

that was ******. prove in my post how i was bias. Floyd has the best resume out of all the fighters and just defended it by KO against an undefeated fighter who peeps though would beat Money May. and nowsaying he should be stripped. ahaahah yeah rite

[THE REED]

that was ******. prove in my post how i was bias. Floyd has the best resume out of all the fighters and just defended it by KO against an undefeated fighter who peeps though would beat Money May. and nowsaying he should be stripped. ahaahah yeah rite

your definitely biased buddy.. as much as i am of roy... look at your avatar and your sig... that = bias... nothing wrong with it... but you are.