Should Floyd be stripped of his WW title/s?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • deevel79
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2005
    • 6831
    • 213
    • 27
    • 13,404

    #1

    Should Floyd be stripped of his WW title/s?

    Since beating Carlos Baldomir for the crown, Mayweather hasn’t defended his title/s against one single welterweight contender to date. Now he is scheduled to face Oscar in Sept. So, should he be allowed to hold on to his titles/belts as if they were superbowl rings, or should he be stripped due to the fact that he is refusing to defend them against his #1 contender, or any other WW for the matter? Vote!
    71
    Yes he should
    50.70%
    36
    No he shouldnt
    49.30%
    35
    Last edited by deevel79; 01-31-2008, 04:01 PM.
  • THE REED
    Sixty Forty
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2007
    • 43489
    • 1,992
    • 1,483
    • 690,068,075

    #2
    who cares... this is the 145th thread on this topic


    are you bettin on the giants or what

    Comment

    • deevel79
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2005
      • 6831
      • 213
      • 27
      • 13,404

      #3
      Originally posted by reedickyaluss
      who cares... this is the 145th thread on this topic


      are you bettin on the giants or what
      Are u saying that its ok to win a title, then refuse to defend it?

      Comment

      • Shalafi
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 3080
        • 88
        • 53
        • 3,357

        #4
        Strip that mother ****er down, including all of his money too.

        Comment

        • Fox McCloud
          Mission Complete!
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Apr 2007
          • 18176
          • 789
          • 1,151
          • 26,037

          #5
          Originally posted by deevel79
          Since beating Carlos Baldomir for the crown, Mayweather hasn’t defended his title/s against one single welterweight contender to date. Now he is scheduled to face Oscar in Sept. So, should he be allowed to hold on to his titles/belts as if they were superbowl rings, or should he be stripped due to the fact that he is refusing to defend them against his #1 contender, or any other WW for the matter? Vote!
          It is riduclous to discount the Hatton defense.

          Should Hopkins have been stripped for fighting Oscar De La Hoya?

          Each had only had one fight at the weight they lost to Hopkins & Mayweather respectively, and in that one fight, they had both won a world title at that weight.

          Comment

          • THE REED
            Sixty Forty
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2007
            • 43489
            • 1,992
            • 1,483
            • 690,068,075

            #6
            Originally posted by deevel79
            Are u saying that its ok to win a title, then refuse to defend it?
            no what im saying is this is the 145th thread on this ****

            Comment

            • RAESAAD
              THE MUTHA****IN TRUTH
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jul 2005
              • 24331
              • 2,370
              • 1,730
              • 40,454

              #7
              Here comes the barrage of "you're a dummy" and "you know nothing" from nuthugging Floyd misfits......You're on your own have fun with that floydtastic ****** and and that droopy **** moin something.......They'll never get it.

              Comment

              • deevel79
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Dec 2005
                • 6831
                • 213
                • 27
                • 13,404

                #8
                For those who vote "NO" Can u please explain why he should be able to keep the titles?

                Comment

                • niceguy45
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 5035
                  • 54
                  • 0
                  • 11,723

                  #9
                  i said this before, yes he should be stripped, i mean you saw margarito had to fight williams in order for him to stay with his WBO which he lost anyways, I believe that should apply to mayweather as well, you just saw casamayor lose his WBC belt for fighting katsidis,

                  Comment

                  • Fox McCloud
                    Mission Complete!
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Apr 2007
                    • 18176
                    • 789
                    • 1,151
                    • 26,037

                    #10
                    Originally posted by deevel79
                    For those who vote "NO" Can u please explain why he should be able to keep the titles?
                    I already did.

                    Hatton had already won a world title at 147, which is more than his mandatory, Berto can say that he has done at 147.

                    Hopkins beat Trinidad and it was okay.

                    Hopkins beat De La Hoya and it was okay.

                    It is okay for Hopkins to defend against Calzaghe.

                    Double standard?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP