Should Floyd be stripped of his WW title/s?

[fabianc]

correction humble is wiser !!!!

go watch your men spank each other. with all this talk of men from u, thats good 4 u.

You have issues Duke, word... I see you are a big Mayrunner fan Huh ??? Strange
very Strange. Manny R. {NYC}

[deevel79]

You can't really compare the others. Floyd only defended the title once and that was with Hatton. But, that does not really count, based upon the fact that Hatton didn't really belong at welterweight, what for one night...so we go back to the question. When and who did Floyd defend the title against ????? we are not speaking of no other weightclass, just welterweight...The answer is NO-ONE. Then he turns around and is getting ready to fight Ocar for another big payday. You're god-damn right they should strip him of the ****in belt, for being a chump and a coward, and for not facing the number one contender who ever it maybe whether its Margo, Paul Williams, or Cotto. However, the WBA champ is Cotto so I believe that should make him the number one contender.
But, that puss, doesn't want no part of Cotto, Floyd does not fear none of these boxers, but, he fears the prospect of losing...That is why he will never
fight Cotto, Williams, or Margarito. All of them can hand him his first loss, and
Floyd doesn't want that. To all of the boxing fans out there, Boxing is not like
it once was 20 yrs. ago...Today anyone can just buy their way into a fight,
like Oscar. What belt does he have ??? None! He is not even in the top ten rank. And the powers that be just let him do what ever the **** he wants, how about the other contenders ??? It is not fair to them. However, in a way,it is thier fault too, because they put up with the **** and don't open their mouths. They must protest, or even boycott his {Floyd's} fights. Cotto is a dumb-ass. If any body has the right to complain is him. They used to call it the mandatory # 1 challenger...Now it is called the one that comes with the most cheddar {$$$}...... I tell you this sport needs to clean house. Another thing, they should not allow anyone to box over the age of 40. Look at Holyfield ... he comes and goes when ever he wants, and they give him a title shot. Then they - Oscar, Arum, Don King - Have the balls to say we want to give the boxing fans what they want to see. Yeah right! MFr's, we the hard-working people, are the fools that fall for that ****. $59.95 out of our pockets. Then after the fight we go to turn off the TV and we say to ourselves, damn they got me again - that was a half-ass boxing match. I am not ordering another PPV again. That lasts until the next mainevent, Then we do it all over again and again. I don't know folks, but, something has got to give. Either we stop giving in to this boxing BS until the powers that be notice the PPV decline and put up better boxing shows or they are going to lose a lot of boxing fans. Well peeps I'm out. And remember dont talk about it,
be about it !!!!!!! Manny R. {New York City} Holler, Stay-up-Hold Your Heads......

POTM = Post Of The Month.

[QuCongee]

I think any champion who goes more than 2 fights without facing the #1 contender should be stripped.

[Fox McCloud]

I think any champion who goes more than 2 fights without facing the #1 contender should be stripped.

So in your world, Floyd facing and beating Cotto and Williams successively would be rightfully stripped?

You may want to rethink what you typed.

[boxingknight]

It is riduclous to discount the Hatton defense.

Hattons not a ww. doesn't matter if he fought in that weight class against Mayweather he still itsn't a ww.

[QuCongee]

So in your world, Floyd facing and beating Cotto and Williams successively would be rightfully stripped?

You may want to rethink what you typed.

Look, you can examine the imperfections of my post if you want. Let me put it another way...

If more champions fought kind of fights Taylor does, boxing would be 10 times better.

[Fox McCloud]

Hattons not a ww. doesn't matter if he fought in that weight class against Mayweather he still itsn't a ww.

So Israel Vazquez is doing a disservice by fighting Rafael Marquez because Marquez was moving up?

Hopkins is disgracing the sport by fighting Calzaghe?

Roger Mayweather = ****ing joke for defending his 140 title against an undefeated Julio Cesar Chavez in his first fight at 140?

Starting to figure out how ridiculous it is not to allow fighters to get title shots who are moving up?

[fabianc]

POTM = Post Of The Month.

THANK YA BROTHA, MY BIG-UP"s TO YOU AND THE REST OF THE NEMBER'S ON THIS SITE. STAY-UP HOLLER... MANNY R. {NYC} **** THE PO-PO
A COP IS A PIG SO GET FRIED IF THEY COME !!!! LIKE THE LATE BIG PUN SAID..... R.I.P. BABY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[FloydFanatic]

You have issues Duke, word... I see you are a big Mayrunner fan Huh ??? Strange
very Strange. YEAH I SAID IT MANNY R. {NYC} BIRD-ASS CHUMP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

what are you talkin bout. son u got no facts and just garbage.

POTM = Post Of The Month.

yeah rite. WPOTM= worst post of the month. thats more like it

I think any champion who goes more than 2 fights without facing the #1 contender should be stripped.

yeah rite the guy i quoted below u.

So in your world, Floyd facing and beating Cotto and Williams successively would be rightfully stripped?

You may want to rethink what you typed.

yeah boi thats how we do. these haters dont understand

So Israel Vazquez is doing a disservice by fighting Rafael Marquez because Marquez was moving up?

Hopkins is disgracing the sport by fighting Calzaghe?

Roger Mayweather = ****ing joke for defending his 140 title against an undefeated Julio Cesar Chavez in his first fight at 140?

Starting to figure out how ridiculous it is not to allow fighters to get title shots who are moving up?

exactly. peeps picked hatton to win 2 and when Floyd knocks him out with the turnbuckle they act like it was a bad dfense. ahaha

[darkvladimir]

Hattons not a ww. doesn't matter if he fought in that weight class against Mayweather he still itsn't a ww.

Umm but it does make a difference though. The belts at stake for Mayweathers defense against hatton were the WBC and Ring magazine WELTERWEIGHT CHAMPIONSHIP. Thats a fact. Now, the fact that Hatton is a natural junior welterweight is another issue, but it doesnt discount that this was a welterweight defense. We have to stick to the facts and adhere to the rules when we form our opinions. Granted, I agree that Floyd should be fighting natural WW fighters in their prime, it doesnt change the fact that he became linear WW champ when he beat Baldomir, was allowed to fight at junior middleweight against Oscar, and then came back to WW to defend against Hatton. I believe the WBC should be enforcing its mandatories upon Mayweather instead of giving him repeated extensions. And Mayweather, as a true prize fighter and champion, should be constantly seeking to fight the best. Just my 2 cents. I know boxing.