We're talking skillwise you ***ing dumb ****... no ****ing **** Morales and Barrera are better career wise because they had the opportunity to fight the best out there, just stfu you dont belong here, go to pacland and chat with your midget friends about what the next excuse is gonna be once one of your pinoy bum prospects loses.
MARQUEZ is a better fighter then BARRERA
Collapse
-
Are you black or Caucasian? Why would a midget race like yours call somebody else a midget? DumbassWe're talking skillwise you ***ing dumb ****... no ****ing **** Morales and Barrera are better career wise because they had the opportunity to fight the best out there, just stfu you dont belong here, go to pacland and chat with your midget friends about what the next excuse is gonna be once one of your pinoy bum prospects loses.
I'm a foot taller than that Mexican I hired to do my Patio and cement my backyard last December 8. Nice guess but I ain't a midget like your brain is.
Marquez has also the opportunity to fight great fighters but he didn't...... he opted for Salido, Polo, and Jaca. Only when his career was winding down that he started talking about fighting the greats.
And how is his boring counterpunching better than the boxing skills of Barrera and Morales? The boxingskills of Barrera whipped the likes of Ayala, Morales and Hamed while Morales' skills held Pacquiao, Jones, Chavez, Chi etc to thier places. What did Marquez' counterpunching do again? All that skill was just enough to get a draw from a 1 dimensional Pacquiao. You're the one who doesn't belong here midget brain.Comment
-
Are you black or Caucasian? Why would a midget race like yours call somebody else a midget? Dumbass
I'm a foot taller than that Mexican I hired to do my Patio and cement my backyard last December 8. Nice guess but I ain't a midget like your brain is.
Marquez has also the opportunity to fight great fighters but he didn't...... he opted for Salido, Polo, and Jaca. Only when his career was winding down that he started talking about fighting the greats.
And how is his boring counterpunching better than the boxing skills of Barrera and Morales? The boxingskills of Barrera whipped the likes of Ayala, Morales and Hamed while Morales' skills held Pacquiao, Jones, Chavez, Chi etc to thier places. What did Marquez' counterpunching do again? All that skill was just enough to get a draw from a 1 dimensional Pacquiao. You're the one who doesn't belong here midget brain.
Im 5'11 and ill stomp your midget ass so my chihuahua can eat your dog eating ass up...
Marquez DIDNT have the opportunity because Nacho is a horrible manager, NO ONE wanted to fight him, not Barrera, not Morales, not Naseem...
Boring? see this is where you dumb pinoys show how fake of a boxing fan you idiots are, that is what the sweet science is all about, nice boxing skills, not some ***ing one-dimensional ***** that throws nothing but rights and lefts all night... Learn about the sport before you start judging how a real boxer fights.. but then i again i know you'll stop watching this sport once your hero retires...so it doesnt really matter.
What did Marquez' counterpunching do again? : Win him all of his fight, yes ***** i said it, ALL of his fights, 2 robberies and a DQ...
Why the *** are you comparing Morales and Barrera's opponents to Marquez? ...This isnt even about that, its about their SKILLS, Marquez would've beaten them the same way they did so wat the *** are you talking about...He didnt even fight those guys
yeah, coming back from 3 knockdowns to get a draw isnt very impressive for you ******s isnt it? you guys dont even know how to score a ***ing fight, u just wait for a knockdown to happen and boom, "omg my boyfriend pacquiao is winning"
You might find him boring because obviously your ****** ass doesnt know **** ABOUT THE SPORT.. now go watch your favorite "sport" poolLast edited by xcaret; 01-08-2008, 05:10 PM.Comment
-
Ahahahaha!!Im 5'11 and ill stomp your midget ass so my chihuahua can eat your dog eating ass up...
Marquez DIDNT have the opportunity because Nacho is a horrible manager, NO ONE wanted to fight him, not Barrera, not Morales, not Naseem...
Boring? see this is where you dumb pinoys show how fake of a boxing fan you idiots are, that is what the sweet science is all about, nice boxing skills, not some ***ing one-dimensional ***** that throws nothing but rights and lefts all night... Learn about the sport before you start judging how a real boxer fights.. but then i again i know you'll stop watching this sport once your hero retires...so it doesnt really matter.
What did Marquez' counterpunching do again? : Win him all of his fight, yes ***** i said it, ALL of his fights, 3 robberies and a DQ...
Why the *** are you comparing Morales and Barrera's opponents to Marquez? ...This isnt even about that, its about their SKILLS, Marquez would've beaten them the same way they did so wat the *** are you talking about...He didnt even fight those guys
yeah, coming back from 3 knockdowns to get a draw isnt very impressive for you ******s isnt it? you guys dont even know how to score a ***ing fight, u just wait for a knockdown to happen and boom, "omg my boyfriend pacquiao is winning"
You might find him boring because obviously your ****** ass doesnt know **** ABOUT THE SPORT.. now go watch your favorite "sport" pool
We're in the internet and Xcaret is claiming 5'11" ...LMAO!! I didn't ask for your height you dumbass...who cares? I'm 6 foot 3 former College basketball player back in motherland......Dip****!! How about that huh?
Marquez is boring and it's a fact! Fact proven by how many flies roam around his fights and how many boos we've heard so many times whenever he fights.
Calling somebody boring is not the gauge of one's boxing knowledge.
Yes it's sweetscience and so? Does that make him better than EM or MAB? His counterpunching isn't even the best, the best counterpunchers in the business is Floyd's and Winky Wright.
Lest we soon forget how great Morales and Barrera was in thier primes. Polls have been made 5 years ago and who was the best and Marquez always comes in below both of them. Dream fights have also been made 5 years ago regarding a match-up between Morales and Marquez (who were both in their primes) MAB vs. JMM and a few people gave JMM a chance. Now that their careers are over...it's soo easy to say that an active, successfull JMM would beat retired legends.
Just look at how JMM performed against a very old Barrera.
Oh the irony!!
Look again who's the real *****.
Comment
-
...Marquez is boring and it's a fact! Fact proven by how many flies roam around his fights and how many boos we've heard so many times whenever he fights.
Calling somebody boring is not the gauge of one's boxing knowledge.
Yes it's sweetscience and so? Does that make him better than EM or MAB? His counterpunching isn't even the best, the best counterpunchers in the business is Floyd's and Winky Wright.
Lest we soon forget how great Morales and Barrera was in thier primes. Polls have been made 5 years ago and who was the best and Marquez always comes in below both of them. Dream fights have also been made 5 years ago regarding a match-up between Morales and Marquez (who were both in their primes) MAB vs. JMM and a few people gave JMM a chance. Now that their careers are over...it's soo easy to say that an active, successfull JMM would beat retired legends.
Just look at how JMM performed against a very old Barrera.
Oh the irony!!
Look again who's the real *****.
only fake boxing "fans" would think hes boring...in this era, its mostly you dumb pinoys...you guys just want to see knockouts or else its boring for u idiots.
Yes it's sweetscience and so? Does that make him better than EM or MAB?: Skillwise YES...
He isnt the best counter-puncher? he sure is ONE of them....So now we're talking about welterweight/middleweights? wtf?
LOL at polls, get the *** out with that dumb kiddy sht..
Just look at how JMM performed against a very old Barrera.: They are both the same AGE you ***ing IDIOTComment

Comment