If thats the case, how do you explain years and years of history where a young fighter who is a loudmouth and wins his fights is always extremely hated?
in Robinsons day it was probably "Man those ******s rally around the one person who gives them some aura of accomplishment to a group of people who have done nothing of any worth since they got their freedom"
in ali's days i know for a fact from family account it was "that loud mouth ****** only attracts hippys and ******'s who embody his typically flamboyant personality, thats why im going for joe frazier, hes a respectable man with respectable traits who resembles what a man should be"
In Whitakers day it was "He just runs around the ring, then calls himself the best but has no knockout power, and then whines when he loses, and then has the nerve to make a claim at being the best fighter in the game when he wont even fight a real fight"
this was told to me in spanish by my friends uncle.
all the fighters i named were hated big time in their day for one reason or another, and again, the only people who clinged to them were apart of the culture they came from. I mean honestly, if you think mayweathers fans are majority teeny boppers and ****, do you think these kids are scrambling to order ppv's with all the money they have? I live in oakland, a majority black city, mayweather has fans from the young black male to the old black female, because Mayweather most reminds them of champions from the past.

Comment