Tougher Fight: Tszyu @ 140... or Delahoya @ 154?
Collapse
-
-
So now I can't call a spade when i see a spade?
The thing why I call on some delusional fans (this is actually redundant because fan is short for fanatic) is because some of them make pretenses of giving objective analysis when in reality their posts are made to further some kind of agenda to either prop their fighter, or malign their opponents. I call them out, some of them may prove me wrong, but some of them actually confirm my original hypothesis.
Of course, this is all in search for the better argument, and regardless of the proclamations of each side of victory, it is the reader who sees for himself who is correct and who is not.Comment
-
FYI, a person can vote and refrain from posting at the same time.Nor do I. I even regret calling joepal a dumb ****. But at the end of the day, it was more of a backhand at what he was saying then an actual jab at him, personally. Regardless, it's just a message board.
By the way, notice the gap on this poll closing, yet no one is posting WHY?
The gap is closing because they see the error of the DLH UD > KO KT theory. Which is IMO, one of the most ridiculous theories posted here in boxingscene.
This notwithstanding the confusing premise Dios set out in the beginning.Comment
-
I realize they can do that. I was asking because the same 4 or 5 people were posting, yet the poll kept changing. And FYI, the poll is still in favor of Mayweather.FYI, a person can vote and refrain from posting at the same time.
The gap is closing because they see the error of the DLH UD > KO KT theory. Which is IMO, one of the most ridiculous theories posted here in boxingscene.
This notwithstanding the confusing premise Dios set out in the beginning.Comment
-
If you're going to call me a nuthugger, make sure you have some TRUE proof. Not that I just disagree with you. No law against that.So now I can't call a spade when i see a spade?
The thing why I call on some delusional fans (this is actually redundant because fan is short for fanatic) is because some of them make pretenses of giving objective analysis when in reality their posts are made to further some kind of agenda to either prop their fighter, or malign their opponents. I call them out, some of them may prove me wrong, but some of them actually confirm my original hypothesis.
Of course, this is all in search for the better argument, and regardless of the proclamations of each side of victory, it is the reader who sees for himself who is correct and who is not.Comment
-
Generalizations are not helpful. I am not that sensitive in my opinion, probably because I think I am smart enough that I can get **** done through argument, instead of personal attacks.
Listen, the second part of your post is either:
New or wrong, because I know for a fact you jumped my **** when you first showed up here... I thought you were a total ****bag, but it seems like you have gotten your **** together a little.
I consider calling someone a nuthugger or biased a personal attack (unless they do something that clearly justifies that claim, ie Kelly Pavlik would KO Marvin Hagler in 3).Comment
-
I think Oscar would be a tougher fight than Tyszu. Tyszu was eazy to out box but he always had a punchers chance. Oscar can box and he has a punchers chance. that is why i chose Oscar. The only problem with Oscar now is that oscar fades late.Comment
-
You answered it yourself. People can actually vote even if they dont post. So even if the same guys were discussing, viewers could vote at anytime, then get out of the thread.
Of course, even if Floyd won this poll, it would be tainted because of the confusing premise set forth by the pollster. Check out some of the posts in this thread, they were actually in response to what Wiley said, which is not exactly what the pollster asked as a question.Comment
-
Yeah sure, really, most of the personal attacks come from Floyd fans, check their threads. Not only do they make personal attacks, they INSPIRE a lot of personal attacks. THEY are clearly the source of insults in here, just check a Dios thread to see my point.Generalizations are not helpful. I am not that sensitive in my opinion, probably because I think I am smart enough that I can get **** done through argument, instead of personal attacks.
Listen, the second part of your post is either:
New or wrong, because I know for a fact you jumped my **** when you first showed up here... I thought you were a total ****bag, but it seems like you have gotten your **** together a little.
I consider calling someone a nuthugger or biased a personal attack (unless they do something that clearly justifies that claim, ie Kelly Pavlik would KO Marvin Hagler in 3).
You know what, I really think there is more merit in saying that Pavlik can KO Hagler in three (not saying that there is merit, just more) than saying that an Oscar UD > TKO KT. Especially if you saw how Floyd won (or not lose) against Oscar and compare it to how the great KT quit on his stool, frustrated.Comment
Comment