Sad thing about Floyd...

[Fox McCloud]

A delusional Floyd nuthugger like you talking about exaggerations? Are you ****ing kidding me?

You know, it's not a coincidence that pretty much every fan of Floyd on this site thinks you are a ****ty poster.

I have a hard time believing that EVERY Floyd fan is a nuthugger. The objective ones have problems with your posts too, because they are not objective. That's all there is too it.

[joepal]

I totally disagree with that.

Floyd won that fight 116-112 and the photos of Oscar are fake.

Man you're all wrong. 116-112 is too much and if those photos were fake Oscar wouldnt spend $2M to just douse the issue.

[joepal]

You know, it's not a coincidence that pretty much every fan of Floyd on this site thinks you are a ****ty poster.

I have a hard time believing that EVERY Floyd fan is a nuthugger. The objective ones have problems with your posts too, because they are not objective. That's all there is too it.

Wow. A very subjective fan talking about objectivity. The irony.

[Fox McCloud]

Wow. A very subjective fan talking about objectivity. The irony.

I mean, I'm pretty confident that I could get voted more objective than you by the posters on this forum. I'll leave it at that.

[sonofisis]

A delusional Floyd nuthugger like you talking about exaggerations? Are you ****ing kidding me?

If Floyd didn't have so many haters I wouldn't mind if he'd lose every fight he had. But what irks me is stubborn jerks who don't give props when they're due because they're crabs. So when ever objectivity comes knocking at your door, you crabs merely resort to ad hominems against the source of it, resorting to childish epithets like "nuthugger".. Completely juvenile and does nothing by way of discrediting me or the fighter you seem to so hate, but instead makes you look like the fool that you were born to become.

I kinda disagree with you on that one, to be honest.

Disagree with this post, but agree with your previous post. People go way overboard calling him a coward and overrated and all this other bull****, but others think he's an invinvible god, and truth is he's somewhere in between, closer to invincible than a coward but you see what i'm saying, he's not unbeatable and has made some bad choices.

Naw, I get you guys, since there's a lot of Floyd idiots also. I guess what I meant is that the arguments supporting Mayweather seem to be more logically sound than the ones bashing him..

[Run]

Man you're all wrong. 116-112 is too much and if those photos were fake Oscar wouldnt spend $2M to just douse the issue.

The photos were called fakes by an "expert". I don't know about his credentials or whatnot. All I know is........they look fake as hell and I was never convinced with the whole Oscar as a moonlighting ****** thing.

As for the fight....the looping right hands Floyd landed clean on Oscar had to have been scored. I didn't like the outcome......and I really was pulling for Oscar to win the fight but I would never score a fight with a bias.

I see that too often. I'm not necessarily claiming you're biased.......but the only way I could fathom scoring that fight in Oscar's favor is if I was watching him fight as opposed to watching objectively.

The punches weren't doing much damage to his face.......yeah. But that doesn't change the fact they were landing flush over and over.

Oscar said Floyd's punches weren't anything special at all. I'd believe him in they didn't really phase or stun him and they just bounced off his face, lol.



Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

[joepal]

I mean, I'm pretty confident that I could get voted more objective than you by the posters on this forum. I'll leave it at that.

Well, with an abundance of Floyd nuthuggers around here who say that Pac fought shot fighters, I wouldnt be surprised.

[Fox McCloud]

Naw, I get you guys, since there's a lot of Floyd idiots also. I guess what I meant is that the arguments supporting Mayweather seem to be more logically sound than the ones bashing him..

That happens when you try to say the consensus P4P #1 sucks... usually the side that all the experts back is more a logically sound side of an argument.

[joepal]

The photos were called fakes by an "expert". I don't know about his credentials or whatnot. All I know is........they look fake as hell and I was never convinced with the whole Oscar as a moonlighting ****** thing.

As for the fight....the looping right hands Floyd landed clean on Oscar had to have been scored. I didn't like the outcome......and I really was pulling for Oscar to win the fight but I would never score a fight with a bias.

I see that too often. I'm not necessarily claiming you're biased.......but the only way I could fathom scoring that fight in Oscar's favor is if I was watching him fight as opposed to watching objectively.

The punches weren't doing much damage to his face.......yeah. But that doesn't change the fact they were landing flush over and over.

Oscar said Floyd's punches weren't anything special at all. I'd believe him in they didn't really phase or stun him and they just bounced off his face, lol.

What punches? Jeebus man elevate your standards.

[Fox McCloud]

Well, with an abundance of Floyd nuthuggers around here who say that Pac fought shot fighters, I wouldnt be surprised.

Whatever, there is seriously no back-down in you, no matter how wrong you are, and how many times it is proven to you that you are wrong, you don't ever shut the **** up.

Seriously... you are the first person I am putting on my block list.

You beat out DaveBrown and Viva Mexico!!!

That is incredible. Well done.