Pretty Boy vs Hitman
Collapse
-
Why do you ask me this? When did I make fun of someone for saying Hatton was invincible? Anyway, that's beside the point, because even though both of them are undefeated Hatton has shown he has MUUUUUCHHH more flaws than Floyd, and his level of opposition is very weak compared to Floyd's.Comment
-
First of all, if you've seen any of Floyd's fights (which I doubt based on your assestment that "it's almost as if he let Oscar hit him") you'll know that he goes to the ropes and corners on purpose. He loves slipping and evading punches there to tire his opponents out. And if you think what Oscar threw there was landing, you're a ****ing joke. It looked like he was scratching Floyd or trying to kill flies near him when he threw those silly-ass "body punches"
Hatton is NOT the best budypuncher in the game (that would be Cotto without a doubt) and even still, who has he faced that has been HALF as good defensively as Mayweather is?
I've seen about 10/15 full Floyd fights. I maintain he leaves himself open to the body. Numerous times in the Oscar fight he left himself open to the body attack. It's a matter of how quick Hatton can go from head to body.
The majority of De La Hoya's punches landed at the body, the head shots either missed or were parried. Don't try and put words into my mouth, son.
I never said Hatton is the best bodypuncher, i said he is one of the best body punchers. Off the top of my head he has more stoppages via bodyshots than Cotto anyway (and i've seen a fair amount of Cotto fights) - what does that tell you? Hatton is murderous to the body.
Hatton hasn't fought anybody quite as defensive as Mayweather, but has Floyd fought an undefeated, vibrant fighter with the speed, footwork and variety of punches of Hatton? Even in the Castillo fight, Castillo looked fairly slow. Hatton will throw 50% more punches than Castillo did.
De La Hoya couldn't sustain his attacks - Hatton will.Comment
-
It gets to the point where i cant be bothered to explain anymore, i have said it before, most of the predictions concerning hatton beating mayweather dont concern actual facts or logic.Why do you ask me this? When did I make fun of someone for saying Hatton was invincible? Anyway, that's beside the point, because even though both of them are undefeated Hatton has shown he has MUUUUUCHHH more flaws than Floyd, and his level of opposition is very weak compared to Floyd's.
They usually concern the following unfounded statements.
-Ricky has the style to beat mayweather
-This is gonna be like Leonard -Duran one.
- Ricky wasnt the favorite against Kostya either, so that means he beats mayweather.
It tells you alot about Hatton's Realistic chances against mayweather.Comment
-
Comment
-
Exactly. And the dude who made this topic said Hatton will sustain Floyd's attacks, the same Hatton who almost got KTFO by Luis Collazo haha, marvelous.It gets to the point where i cant be bothered to explain anymore, i have said it before, most of the predictions concerning hatton beating mayweather dont concern actual facts or logic.
They usually concern the following unfounded statements.
-Ricky has the style to beat mayweather
-This is gonna be like Leonard -Duran one.
- Ricky wasnt the favorite against Kostya either, so that means he beats mayweather.
It tells you alot about Hatton's Realistic chances against mayweather.Comment
-
You were saying that Floyd IS invincible and that nobody has beaten him. The same logic applies for Hatton, surely? I agree, Hatton hasn't faced the opposition Floyd has but this is about styles and although some say Hatton has more weaknesses than Floyd that doesn't mean he will be allowed to take advantage of them weaknesses.Why do you ask me this? When did I make fun of someone for saying Hatton was invincible? Anyway, that's beside the point, because even though both of them are undefeated Hatton has shown he has MUUUUUCHHH more flaws than Floyd, and his level of opposition is very weak compared to Floyd's.
It gets to the point where i cant be bothered to explain anymore, i have said it before, most of the predictions concerning hatton beating mayweather dont concern actual facts or logic.
They usually concern the following unfounded statements.
-Ricky has the style to beat mayweather
-This is gonna be like Leonard -Duran one.
- Ricky wasnt the favorite against Kostya either, so that means he beats mayweather.
It tells you alot about Hatton's Realistic chances against mayweather.
You're full of ****. This statement is backed up by the fact that you enjoy watching the two nerds on boxing4real.Comment
-
LUIS COLLAZO TOOK ADVANTAGE OF HIS WEAKNESSESYou were saying that Floyd IS invincible and that nobody has beaten him. The same logic applies for Hatton, surely? I agree, Hatton hasn't faced the opposition Floyd has but this is about styles and although some say Hatton has more weaknesses than Floyd that doesn't mean he will be allowed to take advantage of them weaknesses.
What does Collazo have that Floyd doesn't?Comment
-
[QUOTE=tito yuca;2537094]luis collazo took advantage of the fact that hatton had just four weeks to gain around 7lbs of muscle.You were saying that Floyd IS invincible and that nobody has beaten him. The same logic applies for Hatton, surely? I agree, Hatton hasn't faced the opposition Floyd has but this is about styles and although some say Hatton has more weaknesses than Floyd that doesn't mean he will be allowed to take advantage of them weaknesses.
LUIS COLLAZO TOOK ADVANTAGE OF HIS WEAKNESSES
What does Collazo have that Floyd doesn't?Comment
Comment