Boxing peeps are so fearful and hurt with MMA getting bigger, good ppv numbers, dredging up all this old, outdated, ignorant, "Its barbaric human ****fighting" bull from 1995.
Its seems to me the repeated argument on this thread and elsewhere is boxfans saying MMA-striking is inferior not up to par- Yes, in a boxing ring.
You guys need to get it in your heads that there have been 15+ yrs of people trying to figure out striking that works best in MMA. Because of the glove size, clinch work, takedown defense, number of strikes (from hands and feet), a pure boxing appraoch simply doesnt work in MMA. Jabs, feet planting, and so forth is a recipe for disaster against certain fighters. And, for instance, because of the more open defenses, winging loopy punches works better in MMA than in boxing.
As for not liking or understanding groundwork- thats fine. Boxing is a more refined sport, but only because MMA fighters have about 50 times more things to worry about. If you are educated and enjoy all those aspects, its a very enjoyable thing to watch.
Its seems to me the repeated argument on this thread and elsewhere is boxfans saying MMA-striking is inferior not up to par- Yes, in a boxing ring.
You guys need to get it in your heads that there have been 15+ yrs of people trying to figure out striking that works best in MMA. Because of the glove size, clinch work, takedown defense, number of strikes (from hands and feet), a pure boxing appraoch simply doesnt work in MMA. Jabs, feet planting, and so forth is a recipe for disaster against certain fighters. And, for instance, because of the more open defenses, winging loopy punches works better in MMA than in boxing.
As for not liking or understanding groundwork- thats fine. Boxing is a more refined sport, but only because MMA fighters have about 50 times more things to worry about. If you are educated and enjoy all those aspects, its a very enjoyable thing to watch.
Comment