Tweet
Oh dear, think i have found proof he was wrong, lets see
-
-
hehehehe
This one is getting interesting....Comment
-
-
Stop ruining te thread guys, just chill the **** out.
T_S Joe would have had a GREAT career should he finish up beating Kessler, Hopkins and an unbeaten Taylor. His biggest wins would be up there with Mayweather's current efforts but Mayweather's achievements in moving up and becoming THE champ at 3 different weights plus taking alphabet titles in 2 others would of course mean he had a better legacy. But Mayweather is a top 20, possibly top 10 all-time fighter, it'd be hard to better him.
Anyway, back to the topic - anyone no anymore about this? have Palle responded yet. Even I can't wait to stick it to some of the more moronic posters on this forum if calzaghe (champ) travels to the challenger's back yard, when most US fighters have never left the states.
It would lend credence to Warren as well. God he needs it, the horrible little toad.Comment
-
You just dont get it. You latch on to insignificant things in order to disguise the fact that you just have no argument at all.
My argument has been that if Calzaghe beats two guys who have been prevalent in top 10 P4P list for much of past few years...then it is arguable that his top victories are better than PBF's top victories. You evidently realise that you cant argue against that, so you look to pull inaccuracies out of other things in order to win a completely different argument.
Just admit that Calzaghe beating Hopkins and Taylor may to SOME PEOPLE be (without them being wrong) more significant than the top victories that PBF has had.
You go around in circles and circles just to avoid admitting that you are wrong. I dont give a **** if I am wrong about Taylor not being P4P number 1 when he beat Hopkins, I genuinely genuinely dont. My source was evidently not reliable and I dont have an infinite knowledge of the Ring magazine's top lists. However, as it was only a very very minor point of my argument, it makes very little difference to me whether it was right or wrong. You on the other hand seem to be deciding that because Taylor WASNT P4P number 1 after beating Hopkins, that somehow you are completely right about the fact that (to paraphrase your point): ANYONE who claims that Calzaghe beating Hopkins and Taylor would mean that he'd beaten two better fighters than Floyd Mayweather's top two victories is not only wrong...but are in fact claiming that Calzaghe has a better legacy than Mayweather, has achieved more than Mayweather, is a better boxer than Mayweather, ****d Mayweather's mother, deserves a higher placing on the all-time-great list than Mayweather etc etc etc.
Which frankly, is utterly ridiculous.Comment
-
Mik, you insulted me when i tried to talk boxing with you, cos you cant talk boxing, ive set the record straight, im done with you.
Regards, tech.
Originally posted by Miksterious View PostOriginally posted by Miksterious View Post
To see if Mik, was right, please click here, Lmao.
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...php?p=2403201#Comment
-
Only you would claim a victory due to an inaccuracy over Jermain Taylor's P4P ranking in a debate arguing that it would be fair for SOME PEOPLE to claim that Joe Calzaghe defeating Hopkins/Wright and Taylor would have meant that the two top names on his resume were of a higher quality than the two top names on PBF's current resume.
You can see that, right?
The argument never has been or will be about Taylor's placement. It is thus:
"COULD you argue that Calzaghe defeating Taylor and Hopkins would mean that he has defeated two fighters better than anyone Floyd Mayweather has fought?"
Mik - Yes, you COULD.
Technical_Skill - No. That is utterly inarguable. To argue that would be to claim that Calzaghe is the better boxer than Floyd. Has better skills than Floyd. Has a better legacy than Floyd. Is a greater all-time fighter than Floyd and has accomplished more in his career than Floyd has.
I can see why you are latching on to the Taylor argument...because there is no ****ing way anyone in their right mind would possibly agree with your argument. Maybe I ought to start a poll up about that and then 'own' you when the results go my way (although perhaps I shouldnt say that, as no doubt you'll start up your own twisted version of the poll, completely taken out of context and not in anyway reflecting the attrociously ridiculous views you've expressed in this thread...cos...thats what you do).
You'll have to excuse me for now pal. I'm off out for the night. Only mentioning this of course because you are one of these people of the opinion that if you dont reply to anything for 6 hours, its because you've been thinking of what to say for 6 hours.Comment
-
lol
Its not that we all had the crack on here today it was all in jest
He took it to heart and you could tell the mans pride was hurt..
I'd rather kill him with facts of boxing then having to run him clean off
TS you have done that 4 us all....Comment
-
-
lolol......Comment
Comment