Calzaghe accepts offer to fight Kessler

[Technical_Skill]

No he isnt..

U dont need to compare them though bra...
There 2 different type of fighters all together..
Joe is doing his thing and Mayweather has done his...

Well according to the boxing guru, aka Miksterious,

1) Jermaine taylor was pound 4 pound number one. (still waiting for conformation of this lmao)

2) If JC beats taylor and Hopkins it can be argued he has fought better top fighters than mayweather.

lol.

[Super Cartel]

Miksterious,

m8 dont even start about that country ****head,,
Dont take anything serious from a guy that comes from Sunderland bra
Im suprised they even have boxing down there..

There so behind that Tyson as just lost to buster douglas now lol

[Technical_Skill]

hmm, lets leave it there, he thinks were are attempting to destroy him, so lets not say anymore about him.

I think Kessler has taken this fight too early, and now palle has to back up all that talk,

However what if, this is al bull**** and JC ends up fighting Ikin, can you imagine that,

Dont be surprised if Fat Frank Warren pulls out of the fight and this was all a scam to make it look like he wanted to do the fight over there.

lol.

[Super Cartel]

I dont think its a scam m8 i really believe that Joe wants
to fight Kessler and thats the next step for him..
Taylor dosent seem to want it,Hopkins is busy,It makes perfect sense....

TS do u enjoy a good book m8?
check out Joe's autobiography it was out last week very interesting read indeed...

[.Mik.]

****ing hell, you are such a joke.

Well according to the boxing guru, aka Miksterious,

1) Jermaine taylor was pound 4 pound number one. (still waiting for conformation of this lmao)

2) If JC beats taylor and Hopkins it can be argued he has fought better top fighters than mayweather.

lol.

1). Ring Magazine named him their P4P number 1 fighter after he defeated Bernard Hopkins. It stated this at the ****ing time, so why dont you just read the original post and notice it.

2). If JC beats Taylor and Hopkins it CAN quite reasonably be argued that he has defeated better TOP fighters than PBF. ie, he has defeated two fighters high on the P4P list. I said 'It can be argued' not 'it is fact' something that you seem completely incapable of comprehending. At no point did I say that he was a better boxer than PBF. At no point do I say that he is a more skilled ring technician than PBF. At no point do I say that his accomplishments in the ring are as impressive as PBF's. At no point do I say that he has a better legacy than PBF. What I do, quite clearly, quite blatantly and quite rightly point out is that IT CAN BE ARGUED that the top guys Calzaghe has faced (if he defeats Taylor and Hopkins) are better than the top guys PBF has faced.

Try and digest that into your obstinately thick skull, you utter utter moron.

[Technical_Skill]

TS do u enjoy a good book m8?

With my literacy? lol.

Only thing i read is heat magazine, and books for the degree course im going to fail.

Other than that its Pro Evolution Soccer all the way. lol.

[Super Cartel]

hehehehe

Get yourself Joe calzaghe's book its a good read.
It was out last week

[Technical_Skill]

****ing hell, you are such a joke.

Getting upset, knew he couldnt stick to boxing talk for long, the insults always come eventually. lol

1). Ring Magazine named him their P4P number 1 fighter after he defeated Bernard Hopkins. It stated this at the ****ing time, so why dont you just read the original post and notice it.

Really? im going to check that, see, i thought Floyd Mayweather inherited the p4p number one after hopkins lost, but your telling me ring magazine had taylor at number one, Taylor hasnt lost since then, so how the hell did mayweather get to pound 4 number one? please tell me.

lol.



Before i consider the rest of your 'boxing knowledge i just wanna check the taylor thing, then ill carry on from here.



lol.

[.Mik.]

The rest of it isnt boxing 'knowledge' mate, its simple debate. You just cannot possibly recognise anything that hasnt come from your own keyboard to be arguable.

I post something that is so logical that all you need to say is "I disagree to" and instead you respond with "lol, you say that he IS better than Pbf?! lol." when its not what I've said at all. You are arguing with yourself, because you are either blatantly not listening to what I say, or are just too simple to possibly understand that I am and invariably do talk in shades of grey on this boxing forum. Because...and this is the big one...very few people are RIGHT or WRONG with what they say about comparing quality, or future fights. So you ought to quit claiming that YOU and YOU ALONE are right.

If I insult you, its because you are so incredibly dense that it seems to be the only way to get another into your head. You dont 'debate', you ridicule things that havent even been said.

[Technical_Skill]

The rest of it isnt boxing 'knowledge' mate, its simple debate. You just cannot possibly recognise anything that hasnt come from your own keyboard to be arguable.

I post something that is so logical that all you need to say is "I disagree to" and instead you respond with "lol, you say that he IS better than Pbf?! lol." when its not what I've said at all. You are arguing with yourself, because you are either blatantly not listening to what I say, or are just too simple to possibly understand that I am and invariably do talk in shades of grey on this boxing forum. Because...and this is the big one...very few people are RIGHT or WRONG with what they say about comparing quality, or future fights. So you ought to quit claiming that YOU and YOU ALONE are right.

If I insult you, its because you are so incredibly dense that it seems to be the only way to get another into your head. You dont 'debate', you ridicule things that havent even been said.

Lets just see, if what you said was true, if it is, well done, and ill get to the rest of your post.