You are dumb because you're hung up in the analogy.
Did I call De La Hoya Jeff Lacy? No. I stated that in these two fights, De La Hoya and Lacy were clearly the bigger punchers. However, being a big puncher shouldn't score points unless you LAND EFFECTIVE to utilize that power. And sorry, but when you're the bigger puncher, and your jab is your most consistent and best punch of the fight, you are not winning and not utilizing the power advantage.
So, genius, anymore points that complete kabashes your opinion you want to ignore, or am I done here?
Did I call De La Hoya Jeff Lacy? No. I stated that in these two fights, De La Hoya and Lacy were clearly the bigger punchers. However, being a big puncher shouldn't score points unless you LAND EFFECTIVE to utilize that power. And sorry, but when you're the bigger puncher, and your jab is your most consistent and best punch of the fight, you are not winning and not utilizing the power advantage.
So, genius, anymore points that complete kabashes your opinion you want to ignore, or am I done here?
Comment