Do you think Joe Calzaghe is ducking Kessler??
Collapse
-
Until then, I'll consider him to be a good fighter against average opposition.Comment
-
The problem with the names you name.. One guy is 41.. another is a natural Super welter weight.. and the other is a middleweight.. It still seems a bit dodgy...BUT it would still say more than beating an overrated and over protected Marcus BeyerComment
-
You cant force people to fight you.
Why arent you getting on their backs?Comment
-
I like Joe...but I also feel is a good, skilled fighter who is content. Content to be known over the pond in Europe and not fight any dangerous American fighters.Comment
-
Wise words from Welter.Comment
-
I cant agree less with this. I guess we'll have to wait until after the Manfredo fight before we get a good indication of his intentions.Comment
-
So you're telling me that suddenly, after Lacy, his choice in opponents is going to differ drastically? I mean, he is not a new fighter. The guy is going to be running towards the end of his career soon....and all indications thus far say he's a good fighter who is content fighting limited opposition. I mean, sure, Lacy was undefeated- but that really spells untested. Calzaghe's follow up fight was against a contender reject? What..? Where is the logic in that? Sakio Bika and now this? He's falling right back into his routine of picking fringe contenders to dismantle.Comment
-
Jebus, he’s already beat Eubank, Lacy, Brewer, Mitchell, Veit, Sheika, Woodhall and Reid, (6 of the 8 were in their “primes” to, yes including Mitchell, oh did I mention 4 of those were considered the absolute best at the division at one time or another).
His record is great as it is, Nard or Taylor would just be icing on the cake.
Kessler on the other hand looked **** against "China Chinned" Mundine, get off his nuts already.Comment
Comment