Whether JMM won or lost aganist Pacman will be one of the most disputed topics of conversation amongst boxing fans. This fact you can't dispute:
1. JMM though he looked good against Jaca, he looked slow and he got hit quite a bit against a far inferior opponet.
2. If Jaca is slower pacman (which he should not be mention in the same breath of pacquiao) why was JMM still having trouble with the straight left hand (which is the money punch of pacman)?
3. All boxing fans know that the straight left is the signature punch of pacquiao and JMM continued to get hit by is throughout this fight and the fight against pacman. This does not look good for a fighter who looks like he is in declining slightly.
4. While JMM has screwed himself out of megafights in the past, he clearly does not look like the same fighter that fought pacman. While pacquiao has gotten much better since that night, he still is not unbeatable. This is why I give Guzman the best chance to beat him.
5. As slow as JMM looked last night, I truly believe he's in trouble againist pacman and barrera.
1. JMM though he looked good against Jaca, he looked slow and he got hit quite a bit against a far inferior opponet.
2. If Jaca is slower pacman (which he should not be mention in the same breath of pacquiao) why was JMM still having trouble with the straight left hand (which is the money punch of pacman)?
3. All boxing fans know that the straight left is the signature punch of pacquiao and JMM continued to get hit by is throughout this fight and the fight against pacman. This does not look good for a fighter who looks like he is in declining slightly.
4. While JMM has screwed himself out of megafights in the past, he clearly does not look like the same fighter that fought pacman. While pacquiao has gotten much better since that night, he still is not unbeatable. This is why I give Guzman the best chance to beat him.
5. As slow as JMM looked last night, I truly believe he's in trouble againist pacman and barrera.
Comment