Originally posted by ADP02
View Post
Originally posted by travestyny
View Post
I told you that what I meant and made it clear:
Originally Posted by ADP02 View Post
SO TO BE CLEAR, its not whether they found EPO, which is naturally produced in the body. Its if they found traceable amounts that they meet a certain criteria. If they have a result that is somewhat ambiguous then it does NOT meet the threshold acceptance criteria!
SO TO BE CLEAR, its not whether they found EPO, which is naturally produced in the body. Its if they found traceable amounts that they meet a certain criteria. If they have a result that is somewhat ambiguous then it does NOT meet the threshold acceptance criteria!
BUT you came back with this according to your previous posts:
Originally Posted by travestyny View Post
AND YOU ARE STILL TALKING ABOUT A THRESHOLD. LMAOOOO. POST UP THE THRESHOLD. YOU ARE WRONGGGGG.
AND YOU ARE STILL TALKING ABOUT A THRESHOLD. LMAOOOO. POST UP THE THRESHOLD. YOU ARE WRONGGGGG.
"Originally Posted by ADP02 View Post
Hmmm, maybe you still do not know about EPO?
Here is a definition of Threshold. Got it now? If you still need more info, I will be more than glad to provide it for you ..... see no DUCKING from me.
Threshold: The magnitude or intensity that must be exceeded for a certain reaction, phenomenon, result, or condition to occur or be manifested."
Hmmm, maybe you still do not know about EPO?
Here is a definition of Threshold. Got it now? If you still need more info, I will be more than glad to provide it for you ..... see no DUCKING from me.
Threshold: The magnitude or intensity that must be exceeded for a certain reaction, phenomenon, result, or condition to occur or be manifested."
The above is what we argued on.
I didn't care what was in a document that you provided that had NOTHING to do with EPO testing. I was basically telling you that EPO testing is not black and white. Its not just about finding out if there is an illegal quantifiable amount of substance in a urine sample. yet, all you did was come back with ..... that useless document!
Comment