Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

No boxer could have beat Mike Tyson on the 22nd of November, 1986

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Southpaw Stinger
    Tyson was barely faster than Joe at all, and Joe's chin, stamina and detirmination are better than Tyson. Foreman in his prime was not slow at all and any fighter that would try to swarm him would get pasted. No way Tyson comes forward and some how blocks foremans hooks, jabs, uppercuts and pushes to survive and start punching himself.

    Foreman to destroy Tyson in 3. foreman destroyed smaller guys.

    Liston would destroy Tyson as well in 5 rounds and Ali would school Tyson and finnish him in 9.
    Here is another delusional clown who thinks frazier was faster than tyson . You know what your right and frazier was also faster than ali . Frazier was superman infact.

    Comment


    • Tyson was the second quickest heavy ever.
      All the quicker to run into a hook or uppercut...

      tyson comes in, Foreman pushes him out and jabs him to keep him there. Foreman lets the hooks and uppercuts fly and Tyson is left crying somewhere over the Atlantic.

      Cus used to watch tapes with Tyson of Frazier vs Foreman and told Tyson that a swarmer like him would never be able to beat a person like Foreman. He told Tyson that the only way Foreman could be beaten would be by a tall, rangy fighter.
      Last edited by Southpaw Stinger; 07-21-2006, 06:26 AM.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Southpaw Stinger
        All the quicker to run into a hook or uppercut...

        tyson comes in, Foreman pushes him out and jabs him to keep him there. Foreman lets the hooks and uppercuts fly and Tyson is left crying somewhere over the Atlantic.
        fine think what you like but i hope i have enligtened you to the fact that tyson was a much faster fighter than frazier in ever sense of the word . Tyson possessed the speed of a middleweight in his prime.

        Comment


        • Here is another delusional clown who thinks frazier was faster than tyson . You know what your right and frazier was also faster than ali . Frazier was superman infact.
          I never said frazier was faster than tyson **** head. I said his hand speed was comparable and his foot speed wasn't far behind when you watch him swarm.

          Comment


          • fine think what you like but i hope i have enligtened you to the fact that tyson was a much faster fighter than frazier in ever sense of the word . Tyson possessed the speed of a middleweight in his prime.
            I've seen more than enough of Tyson to make up my own mind thank you.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Southpaw Stinger
              I never said frazier was faster than tyson **** head. I said his hand speed was comparable and his foot speed wasn't far behind when you watch him swarm.
              neither were comparabe. Frazier just looks as fast as tyson because he cut the ring off tyson didnt cut the ring off he just chased them across the ring . Frazier didnt do that he shuffled forward and cut the ring off but he wasent quick on his feet.

              Comment


              • neither were comparabe. Frazier just looks as fast as tyson because he cut the ring off tyson didnt cut the ring off he just chased them across the ring . Frazier didnt do that he shuffled forward and cut the ring off but he wasent quick on his feet.
                Isn't that all he needs to be? Since they both come forward what does it matter?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Southpaw Stinger
                  I've seen more than enough of Tyson to make up my own mind thank you.
                  Well you obviously havent . If you think frazier was nearly as fast as tyson .Now get this it was acknowleded by boxing experts that tyson was as quick as a middleweight and it was acknowledged that frazier had decent speed for a heavyweight .

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Southpaw Stinger
                    Isn't that all he needs to be? Since they both come forward what does it matter?
                    Yeah thats right.What matters is that you are wrong in saying frazier was nearly as quick tyson.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by micky_knox
                      tyson was a lot faster than joe..........hit harder too
                      and a better boxer
                      Frazier didn't lose just because of Foremans punching power, he lost because he was a swarming fighter whom was totally ineffective on the backfoot... George Foreman with his huge physical strength could push any fighter back including tyson. Tyson would be on the backfoot from the start, Foreman throwing sledgehammer blows from the outside as Tyson is forced to backup... as Tyson attempts to get on the inside he would be on the recieving end of Foremans huge uppercuts. I believe without a doubt Tyson would be intimated, discouraged by Foremans physicality and aggression and inevitably knocked out mainly as a result of a huge stylistic disadvantage.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP