Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

No boxer could have beat Mike Tyson on the 22nd of November, 1986

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by hellfire508
    Charles, yes. Walcott, yes. Patterson, yes. Watch the film. Just because they don't constantly rush forward, doesn't mean they weren't fast on their feet. Ever seen Walcott's tricky footwork? He invented the shuffle you know.

    Former Middleweights are obviously faster than a ripped 5,11 220lb heavyweight . You cant compare those guys. Give me a break.

    Comment


    • I remember the first time I saw Tyson vs. berbick. I couldnt believe what I was seeing. Tyson hit Berbick with one punch and Berbick started falling all over the ring. Good times

      Comment


      • On any given day any fighter is beatable, there is no such thing as an unbeatable fighter.

        Comment


        • Just like the schoolyard/bar room "badass" there is always someone badder waiting to show you just that.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Yaman
            Former Middleweights are obviously faster than a ripped 5,11 220lb heavyweight . You cant compare those guys. Give me a break.
            Oh why not? Tyson is "as fast as a middleweight". "All the experts acknowledged this".

            And when was Walcott a light fighter? In his first couple of fights? He made his debut when he was 16, and a few years later he was over 185 pounds. How many people are fully grown by 16? Not many. "Oh but Mike Tyson was 700lbs when he was 12...". I don't care. Ali was 6"3 and 210 in his prime, but was a light-heavy at 18. Does this mean he was a blow up light-heavy? I don't care what they USED to be, its what they were in their prime. Charles was prime at light-heavy, I'll admit that, though at his peak at heavy he weighed 190. Patterson and Walcott were at their peak at heavyweight clearly... so you are talking out of your ass.
            "No, George Foreman is not a good win for Ali, because when he was 5, he only weighed 50 pounds."
            Last edited by hellfire508; 07-21-2006, 07:09 PM.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Mike Tyson77
              I remember the first time I saw Tyson vs. berbick. I couldnt believe what I was seeing. Tyson hit Berbick with one punch and Berbick started falling all over the ring. Good times
              Yeah it was funny, but it still doesn't top Zab's chicken dance. That was ownage.

              Comment


              • sorry Cassius but Iron Mike Tyson IS the Greatest of all time.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by hellfire508
                  Charles, Walcott, Patterson and Ali were all faster than him. And don't call me a moron, I have a thousand times the boxing knowledge you do, so you are only insulting yourself. Frazier a plodder? Hell, what fights of his have you seen?

                  Watch Frazier against the likes of Chuvalo, Quarry, Ramos, Ellis and Foster. He is a machine. Let alone the Frazier of Ali 1. Frazier moves very quickly on his feet. Watch some footage before you embarass yourself. If you would get Tyson's balls out of your mouth, and watched other fighters too, you would see he isn't God.

                  HA.okay.........

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by hellfire508
                    Who is the delusional clown? I take it you've never seen the likes of Robinson, Monzon etc. in action?

                    your stating natural fast middleweights. hell throw in sugar ray leonard while u at it. he pretty much meant average.hell actually no he had welterweight hands be honest with u

                    Comment


                    • Ive heard a lot of experts say that the Buster Dougles that beat Tyson would have beaten any heavyweight in history. I know for a fact Bert Sugar said it.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP