Do you rank Larry Holmes above Rocky Marciano?

[StarshipTrooper]

lol I hear you Ziggy, good to hear from you again! We all have to take the slack up...I got diaper duty this week apparently.

Funny how in three years little has changed: Every Heavyweight thread brings out the size whores :frustrated9:

[Elroy The Great]

Give credit to the people who did the research. Or who wrote the great articles on fighters. for example, Norman Mailer's book on the Ali Foreman fight. But thank you just the same.

Frankly with Google it shouldn't be a problem...

sooooooo.............why not google names of giants YOU say rocky beat up ?

then again, your the guy who mocked me when i mentioned boxing experts.

[Elroy The Great]

Funny how in three years little has changed: Every Heavyweight thread brings out the size whores :frustrated9:

i understand sometimes size doesnt mean shlt. when it comes to rocky, it does. its my opinion that he would catch l after l if he fought in almost any other hw era.

[Elroy The Great]

lol I hear you Ziggy, good to hear from you again! We all have to take the slack up...I got diaper duty this week apparently.

hes sure does look great for a corpse. are you going to his next concert ? maybe your crew can open for him.

[billeau2]

hes sure does look great for a corpse. are you going to his next concert ? maybe your crew can open for him.

ahhahaha! that was so witty.

[StarshipTrooper]

i understand sometimes size doesnt mean shlt. when it comes to rocky, it does. its my opinion that he would catch l after l if he fought in almost any other hw era.

Opinions are like azzholes: Unqualified people like yourself have them and they're all full of ****.

[Elroy The Great]

Opinions are like azzholes: Unqualified people like yourself have them and they're all full of ****.

FINALLY ! someone who forgoes the opinion route and hands out STRAIGHT FACTS !!!!

can YOU supply names if giants rocky beat up ?

[StarshipTrooper]

FINALLY ! someone who forgoes the opinion route and hands out STRAIGHT FACTS !!!!

can YOU supply names if giants rocky beat up ?

Don't be butthurt. The truth is you have no credibility, so any "opinion" you offer can be safely disregarded. The fact that you're a size whore lowers your credibility even further.

[billeau2]

FINALLY ! someone who forgoes the opinion route and hands out STRAIGHT FACTS !!!!

can YOU supply names if giants rocky beat up ?

One sign of mental ******ation is when someone repeats a statement that has no relevance over and over... "Can you name giants rocky beat up?" Listen and try to focus: That may be what you think this is about...but your getting feedback that it is not. Ill refresh once more and call it a day:

You made some unqualified dumb remarks Initially. you were shown proof to show you, in a constructive manner, that you were mislead...Nobody even actually said Holmes of Marciano would prevail mind you... You then became anally chaffed because it became obvious that proof had been put forward.

Then another poster explained to you that what you think Marciano needed to be succesful was way off...Others had also tried to explain to you that for a man who had less reach than virtually every opponent he faced, reach would not be such a handicap to overcome...kind of common sense, and kind of like there are great fighters with precedent...but your **** chaffe continued onward!

I guess a lot of idiots at this point use a device that Hillary Clinton likes to use: repeat something ridiculous enough times and the five hundreth time someone might buy it. So here you are, discusting avi in check, repeating some nonsense about giants...

you might take a clue and just stop posting nonsense, but I doubt you will.

[StarshipTrooper]

One sign of mental ******ation is when someone repeats a statement that has no relevance over and over... "Can you name giants rocky beat up?" Listen and try to focus: That may be what you think this is about...but your getting feedback that it is not. Ill refresh once more and call it a day:

You made some unqualified dumb remarks Initially. you were shown proof to show you, in a constructive manner, that you were mislead...Nobody even actually said Holmes of Marciano would prevail mind you... You then became anally chaffed because it became obvious that proof had been put forward.

Then another poster explained to you that what you think Marciano needed to be succesful was way off...Others had also tried to explain to you that for a man who had less reach than virtually every opponent he faced, reach would not be such a handicap to overcome...kind of common sense, and kind of like there are great fighters with precedent...but your **** chaffe continued onward!

I guess a lot of idiots at this point use a device that Hillary Clinton likes to use: repeat something ridiculous enough times and the five hundreth time someone might buy it. So here you are, discusting avi in check, repeating some nonsense about giants...

you might take a clue and just stop posting nonsense, but I doubt you will.

You don't suppose he's the latest incarnation of "Elroy"? There seems some similarities.....