Originally posted by joeandthebums
View Post
He hasn't needed to expand his repertoire in a long time and so wasn't equipped to, he needs to train like this for Fury it's clear.
When placed in difficult (losing) circumstances people do not attempt something new - hence why he kept to well established and familiar plan A despite it being wrong approach.
I agree, Klitschko style (plan A) is excellent, were it not, he would not of strung together so many title defenses - but against an opponent of a similar size where he was required to change from that style - he was unable to.
It bring us back to the original thread topic.
If Chamberlain spent an unspecific amount of months exclusively training for a single opponent, Muhammad Ali, could he defeat him? Theoretical yes.
It bring us back to the original thread topic.
If Chamberlain spent an unspecific amount of months exclusively training for a single opponent, Muhammad Ali, could he defeat him? Theoretical yes.
This is why I think that a rematch would be very exciting and difficult to predict.
Funny thing is I think the old aggressive Klitschko pre-Steward would have done better with Fury who probably doesn't hit hard enough to stop a bullrushing Wlad or the chin to take the power once it's forced through.
Say he does and continues to box, his next opponent is George Foreman, from the base of his training, acquired skillset and previous strategy - could he do it?
Except I didn't think much of your choice of analogy using Geroge Foreman. ANY skillset is superior over young George's imo. It's just a question of whether you have enough physical attributes to make your skills work against him.
I think Klitschko has done and could alter his style to conquer Fury IN THEORY. Whether he can in fact I dunno.
The good thing is here that we will get to see if he can or not in several months time!!

Comment