Pea, Roy or Floyd?
Collapse
-
There are plenty of threads to discuss the pac May fight....this is not one of them.Comment
-
I don't like hypocracy. i also don't like being socially coerced across threads because i hold a certain opinion. And it really bugs me when seasoned posters like you and Daze act out that way.
There are plenty of threads to discuss the merits of this fight, there is absolutely no reason to have two or three posters start bs on a thread that has nothing to do with an opinion.Comment
-
having said that I did overreact a bit and I apologize. I overreact to things like that because I sincerely believe that one of the biggest dangers with the internet is socially coercing people inappropriately based on what are percieved to be ****** ideas, opinions etc.
Socrates had the best method for showing the validity of an opinion, and at the very least I think people can have areas designed where "no holds barred" if you have a silly notion you get razed....but I also realize this is hard to guage.Last edited by billeau2; 09-22-2015, 07:54 AM.Comment
-
No "opinion" is something that can be challenged where it is appropriate to do so. We are entitled to hold an opinion, when social coercion determines what opinions we hold we have bigger problems than faulty opinions.
There are plenty of threads to discuss the pac May fight....this is not one of them.
We are discussing fights which are important to Pea, Roy and Floyd's career. How they looked. Whether the result was fair etc. Some fights are close and debatable (Floyd-Castillo 1, Pea-Oscar). Some are so wrong they are not even debatable (Pea-JC, probably Pea-Ramirez 1 but I have not seen that one in ages). Finally, some are correct decisions, which idiots like to debate because they cannot accept the outcome, which is more common with recent fights (May-Pac). It seems neither Dan, Dazed, or me feel like dignifying your statement on the fight as a legit opinion. You will have to deal with it.Comment
-
Sure. You probably meant to write "cannot be challenged".
We are discussing fights which are important to Pea, Roy and Floyd's career. How they looked. Whether the result was fair etc. Some fights are close and debatable (Floyd-Castillo 1, Pea-Oscar). Some are so wrong they are not even debatable (Pea-JC, probably Pea-Ramirez 1 but I have not seen that one in ages). Finally, some are correct decisions, which idiots like to debate because they cannot accept the outcome, which is more common with recent fights (May-Pac). It seems neither Dan, Dazed, or me feel like dignifying your statement on the fight as a legit opinion. You will have to deal with it.Comment
-
You owned yourself by getting involved in something that resolved...when you respond toi something you dignify it with a response...so don't go away mad, just go away as they say.
Long after you continued dignifying the issue at hand...it was dealt with...so yeah again: please don't dignify my posts with a response that would be most welcome in your case.
Now you can post on this again, please do, but I will not be dignifying you with a response...you dig!?Comment
-
You owned yourself by getting involved in something that resolved...when you respond toi something you dignify it with a response...so don't go away mad, just go away as they say.
Long after you continued dignifying the issue at hand...it was dealt with...so yeah again: please don't dignify my posts with a response that would be most welcome in your case.
Now you can post on this again, please do, but I will not be dignifying you with a response...you dig!?Comment
-
On the Toney-Jones fight. Normally I would call weight excuses for what they are. Excuses. But Toney's track record shows he could eat and dehydrate his way into horrible performances. So I will buy that from Toney (and also from Duran). I still rank RJ> Toney, and think the outcome would still beat Rj UD12, but no that was not the real Toney. IMO. But I love Toney.Comment
Comment