Louis had skills that transcend any era. One constant mistake people make is to call his deliberate, methodical method "plodding." There is film of young Louis that shows he had quick feet. The methodical way he stalked an opponent was designed for an era when 15 rounds was the norm for a championship fight, which carried on through the seventies, and his so called "plodding" was efficiency.
If one wants to get an idea of Louis in the seventies, one can see that some of the punchers...guys like Shavers, Norton to a degree, Foreman, Lyle were able...Louis had more weapons, was more efficient than any of these men. Louis was good enough defemsively to fight in an era with smaller gloves and not be chin checked into oblivion. Even in his loss to Schmelling it was not his chin.
Jimmy Young might well have been Louis' Billy Conn in this era.... Young was mobile, had good punch resistance and could upset the apple cart with his unorthodox tactics.
I won'tnyet comment on after the seventies suffice to say one has to look fighter by bfighter.
If one wants to get an idea of Louis in the seventies, one can see that some of the punchers...guys like Shavers, Norton to a degree, Foreman, Lyle were able...Louis had more weapons, was more efficient than any of these men. Louis was good enough defemsively to fight in an era with smaller gloves and not be chin checked into oblivion. Even in his loss to Schmelling it was not his chin.
Jimmy Young might well have been Louis' Billy Conn in this era.... Young was mobile, had good punch resistance and could upset the apple cart with his unorthodox tactics.
I won'tnyet comment on after the seventies suffice to say one has to look fighter by bfighter.
Comment