worst hw champ ever

[RockyMarcianofan00]

he fought at middleweight for several years as well.

i'm aware but he was a natrual LHW and a very good, conditioned (not bloated) heavyweight

[IMG]http://i24.***********.com/albums/c49/IrishInsomniac00/other%20boxing%20pictures/thArchie-Moore--C10104813.jpg[/IMG]

[butterfly1964]

i'm aware but he was a natrual LHW and a very good, conditioned (not bloated) heavyweight

[IMG]http://i24.***********.com/albums/c49/IrishInsomniac00/other%20boxing%20pictures/thArchie-Moore--C10104813.jpg[/IMG]

holyfield was a well conditioned hw, does that mean he's not really a natural cruiserweight?

[SuzieQ49]

what in the world is archie moore, then?

let me ask you butterfly,


did archie moore get knocked down by middleweights anytime from 1951-62?

did archie moore weighing 175lb + ever get knocked down by a middleweight?



no answer me this, did archie moore weighing over 175lb ever fight a middleweight?

[butterfly1964]

let me ask you butterfly,


did archie moore get knocked down by middleweights anytime from 1951-62?

did archie moore weighing 175lb + ever get knocked down by a middleweight?



no answer me this, did archie moore weighing over 175lb ever fight a middleweight?

archie moore was a natural middleweight, plain and simple. he just moved up cause he knew he wasn't getting a title shot, that's all.

[blockhead]

archie moore was a natural middleweight, plain and simple. he just moved up cause he knew he wasn't getting a title shot, that's all.

wrong wrong wrong, archie had trouble making weight his entire career. your a jackass.

[butterfly1964]

wrong wrong wrong, archie had trouble making weight his entire career. your a jackass.

cause he had eating problems, doesn't mean that cruiserweight was his natural weight.

[blockhead]

cause he had eating problems, doesn't mean that cruiserweight was his natural weight.

umm, archie is one of the best light heavyweights ever, and a real fighter from back in the day, ever trying to discredit him or someone that he knocked down or beat (which you do often) is ******.

[butterfly1964]

umm, archie is one of the best light heavyweights ever, and a real fighter from back in the day, ever trying to discredit him or someone that he knocked down or beat (which you do often) is ******.

yeah, that's the key word, one of the best "light hw's" ever, but when you move up in weight, your power and chin will diminish. moore has been ko'd by middleweights and lighthw's, but yet it took 9 rounds of wild swinging for "hw" marciano to put him away, and he had to knock moore down 5 or 6 times in order for him to stay down. so what does that say about marciano's power? and on top of that moore was 42 yrs. old when he fought rocky, and when you get older, the fluid between your brain and skull decreases, thus making it easier to get knocked down and out, so logically it should have been easier for marciano to knock out moore than people like leonard murrow and eddie booker, but marciano was given a hell of a time.

[blockhead]

yeah, that's the key word, one of the best "light hw's" ever, but when you move up in weight, your power and chin will diminish. moore has been ko'd by middleweights and lighthw's, but yet it took 9 rounds of wild swinging for "hw" marciano to put him away, and he had to knock moore down 5 or 6 times in order for him to stay down. so what does that say about marciano's power? and on top of that moore was 42 yrs. old when he fought rocky, and when you get older, the fluid between your brain and skull decreases, thus making it easier to get knocked down and out, so logically it should have been easier for marciano to knock out moore than people like leonard murrow and eddie booker, but marciano was given a hell of a time.

what does that say about marciano? that it took him 9 rounds to finish an all time great. not too shabby, and certainly not a valid criticism.
and you yourself have mentioned countless times that marciano was small, so, there you go.

[DaWayne]

NO other than Neon Leon Spinks.