Originally posted by joseph5620
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Greatest Super-Middle of All Times
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by IronDanHamza View PostHow can it possibly not be debatable?
Beating Bute does not elevate Froch to number one in the division. In hindsight we can all see Bute has holes in his game.
Comment
-
Originally posted by soul_survivor View PostThere is an argument to be made that Froch is the best SMW of his generation, that being the resume. Heck Froch fought Bute when he was viewed as untouchable and some had him ranked higher than Ward. Personally, I'm not sure if I'd make that argument, both guys should be ranked alongside each other, one place higher or lower than the other. That's how I see it.
so froch has a better resume because he beat lucian bute?
Comment
-
Originally posted by joseph5620 View PostLOL Dan you know I like you and always respect your opinion. But how can you possibly equate a fighter with another fighter that dominated him and handily beat the other fighter that put a loss on the said fighters record?
Beating Bute does not elevate Froch to number one in the division. In hindsight we can all see Bute has holes in his game.
Froch has lots of good wins.
There's absolutely no doubt Froch has the quantity, and quite the edge.
Ward has the quality, and the win over Froch himself.
So it's debatable, who has the better resume. That's at the absolute least.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IronDanHamza View PostBecause Ward has little other than that.
Froch has lots of good wins.
There's absolutely no doubt Froch has the quantity, and quite the edge.
Ward has the quality, and the win over Froch himself.
So it's debatable, who has the better resume. That's at the absolute least.
which froch wins make his resume superior to one that includes whitewashes of a better kessler than the one froch beat, and froch himself?
Comment
-
personally, i don't think there's much of a need to bring any evidence into the discussion if the participants are people who genuinely know the sport and have no bias on the subject.
is carl froch the best SMW of this era?
don't be ridiculous. andre ward was the best SMW of this era.
Comment
-
Originally posted by New England View Postwhich froch wins make his resume superior to one that includes whitewashes of a better kessler than the one froch beat, and froch himself?
Froch and Kessler are the best wins between them.
But he doesn't have much more than that.
Whereas Froch has Taylor, Dirrell, Kessler Pascal, Bute, Groves x2, Abraham.
Ward has clear edge in quality, Froch had the clear edge in quantity.
It's a non issue because now Ward's out his contract Ward will fly ahead. He could have already if he wasn't side lined for the past 3 years.Last edited by IronDanHamza; 01-13-2015, 04:36 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by joseph5620 View PostI still don't understand how Froch can be considered the best ever at 168. He's lost twice and should have lost to Dirrell in my opinion. His resume is not better than Ward's and I don't even think it's debatable.
Ward clearly beat him. You cant pretend that didn't happen.
The only fighter that can definitively put an end to all discussion is Ward, especially now that his contract situation is cleaned up.
Comment
-
Originally posted by New England View Postso froch has a better resume because he beat lucian bute?
anymore ****** questions?
Comment
-
Comment