Originally posted by Welsh Jon
View Post
But look, we can only rnak guys on what we see and what they did and Naz has better accomplishments, is quicker and hits harder. no argument can be made fenech being better. its just ignorant to think so.
in terms of the MAB yeah he won but it was hardly a destruction, most of the rounds were a disgrace, both men averaging some 30 punches per round, especially the first 6, hardly a destruction.
i dunno where this myth of a destruction has come from, reminds me of all these "fans" who say jmm beat john.
Comment